<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>.</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/" />
<modified>2010-06-26T17:28:21Z</modified>
<tagline></tagline>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2010:/mt/6</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.17">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2010, dtm</copyright>
<entry>
<title>Apple iOS 4 on iPhone 3GS</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2010/06/apple_ios_4_on.html" />
<modified>2010-06-26T17:28:21Z</modified>
<issued>2010-06-25T17:24:10Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2010:/mt/6.407</id>
<created>2010-06-25T17:24:10Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Reviewed by David MacNeill Apple has released a major new version of iOS, the operating system formerly known as iPhone OS. Having spent the week working with iOS 4 on my iPhone 3GS along with a bevy of newly upgraded...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=3>Reviewed by David MacNeill</strong></font><br />

<br /><p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Apple has released a major new version of iOS, the operating system formerly known as iPhone OS. Having spent the week working with iOS 4 on my iPhone 3GS along with a bevy of newly upgraded apps, I am pleased to report that it's all good. Simplistic? Yes, but blissfully true. If you have an iPhone 3GS, iPhone 3G, or second generation iPod touch, there is no downside to making the jump to iOS 4 immediately. </font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The changes are substantial without degrading the elegant simplicity of the iPhone interface. There are over 100 changes in all including some deeply technical bits of interest to app developers, but here I will highlight all the good stuff for iPhone 3GS upgraders like me: Multitasking, fast app switching, app folders, universal mail inbox and message threading, home screen wallpaper, wireless keyboard support, 5X camera zoom and video tap to focus.</font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Multitasking and fast app switching</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Apple has finally allowed app developers to designate a single active program thread that continues to execute when you switch to another app or back to your Home screen. This is not system-wide, desktop OS-style multitasking but a closely controlled capability designed to deliver specific features without compromising performance, reliability, or battery life.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Here's a scenario: Apps that play or stream audio can now continue to do so when they are not in the foreground, as Apple's core music app has done all along. Launch Pandora, select a station - may I humbly suggest David MacNeill Radio? - then jump Home and the music plays on. Double click on the Home button and you'll see a row of your most recently run apps, all of which have been "frozen" in their previous state so you can instantly pick up where you left off. Swipe to the left and you'll see a set of music controls alongside the current music app, flanked by a handy screen rotation lock button.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The new system also allows background GPS tracking for navigation and other location-sensing apps such as the amazing Trapster for real-time notification of speed traps and other road hazards. Voice over IP apps such as Skype can now remain connected in the background while you leave the app to attend to other business. One final multitasking feature that you'll notice is background downloading. The system will now let you start a download, then switch to another app while that file completes its journey to you.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ios4-pandora1.jpg" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="9">
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ios4-fastappswitching.jpg" align="left" hspace="29" vspace="9">
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ios4-audiocontrols.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="9">

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>App folders</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">App Store addicts will love the new folder organization feature on the Home screen. Press and hold an app to get them all dancing, then drag and drop it on any other app to create a folder that can hold up to twelve apps. The folder is automatically named for you depending on the dragged app's type - Utilities, Navigation, Music, and so on, but you can change this name at any time, of course. In my case, I went from eight screens to one displaying nine folders, seven icons for my most often used secondary apps, and the big four core apps in the dock. Took a couple of days to memorize where everything lives but now I love it and I think you will too.</font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Universal Mail inbox and message threading</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">With seven active mail accounts to track I found myself swiping constantly to view each account's inbox dozens of times a day. Now I just scan the new One Inbox To Rule Them All and I am a happy camper. The new auto-threading option (on by default, but defeatable in Settings) groups related emails into a single entity that can be viewed and searched folder-style. I don't use threading on my other computers but it makes perfect sense on my iPhone.</font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Home screen wallpaper</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Not a huge deal but still a nice touch for people who like to customize the look of their phones. You can choose from a selection of attractive textures from Apple or use a photo from your library. You can also simply press and hold on an image in a web page, save it, then designate it as your new wallpaper. Some reviewers have found the Apple supplied wallpapers to be a bit on the distracting side and have created their own using more subtle hues and textures.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ios4-musicapps.jpg" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="9">
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ios4-inbox.jpg" align="left" hspace="29" vspace="9">
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ios4-wallpapers.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="9">

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Bluetooth keyboard support</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Writers who like to travel light will love pairing a Bluetooth keyboard with their iOS 4-equipped iPhone or iPod touch, a feature already present in the iPad. Screen keyboards are fine for light to moderate text entry but when it's heavy editing time a real keyboard makes an enormous difference in your productivity and comfort. Most function and navigation keys are supported as well as audio transport buttons if present.</font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Camera zoom and video tap to focus</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The iPhone 3GS' fixed focal length 3-megapixel camera can now digitally zoom up to 5X, though at a noticeable loss in image quality. The reason is that it's a software trick using cropping rather than a true optical zoom. Still, there are times when a close, grainy image is better than none at all. To activate, simply tap on your screen and a slider pops up for your zooming pleasure. A welcome addition to the video camera is one we already enjoy on the still camera side, namely the ability to tap the screen where you want the autofocus to aim. </font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ios4-camera.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="0">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">In addition to these obvious upgrades there are numerous user security improvements, enhanced enterprise support for remote administration and multiple Exchange accounts, and dozens of little enhancements to the user interface across the board, all of which make the iPhone experience more elegant and reliable than ever. In keeping with Apple's uncanny ability to improve performance with each successive upgrade, iOS 4 makes my 3GS feel even more responsive. How they accomplish this while adding so many additional features is remarkable.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Older iPhones and iPod touch devices are not completely left out of the fun, though sadly iOS 4 is not supported on the original iPhone 2G, the first generation iPod touch, nor on the current 8GB iPod touch. Due to performance contraints in these devices, Apple chose to not allow them to be upgraded to the new operating system. For the iPhone 3G and later iPod touch devices, a healthy subset of the new features are provided. And of course, for the full iOS 4 experience you'll want to upgrade to the new iPhone 4, which I plan to do as soon as I can.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">And what about the mighty iPad? Not to worry. Apple will release a free upgrade to iOS 4.1 for iPad this Fall. It can't arrive soon enough for me; now that I've gotten used to the unified inbox, background audio, and other productivity enhancements on my iPhone, it's a bit frustrating to go back to my iPad's "old" iOS 3.2.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Apple has provided iOS 4 as a free upgrade through iTunes. What's not to love?<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i> ~ David MacNeill (personalmediareview@gmail.com)</i></font></p>

<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=1><i>David MacNeill produces <a href="http://personalmediareview.com/">PersonalMediaReview.com</a>, covering the tools and technologies for creating and enjoying media. He is co-founder and editor-in-chief of <a href="http://digicamera.com/">Digital Camera Magazine</a>, the first all-digital photography magazine, and executive editor of <a href="http://hhcmag.com/">Handheld Computing Magazine</a> and <a href="http://pencomputing.com/">Pen Computing Magazine</a>.</i></font></p>
]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Safari 5 adds Reader, raw speed, and extension support</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2010/06/safari_5_adds_a.html" />
<modified>2010-06-10T21:06:42Z</modified>
<issued>2010-06-08T22:07:36Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2010:/mt/6.398</id>
<created>2010-06-08T22:07:36Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> Reviewed by David MacNeill While there was certainly no shortage of exciting news emanating from Apple&apos;s World Wide Developer Conference in San Francisco, there was nothing a non-developer could use immediately, with one exception. Safari 5 for Mac OS...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/safarireader.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="0">
<strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=3>Reviewed by David MacNeill</strong></font><br />

<br /><p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">While there was certainly no shortage of exciting news emanating from Apple's World Wide Developer Conference in San Francisco, there was nothing a non-developer could use immediately, with one exception. Safari 5 for Mac OS X and Windows was quietly released in the afternoon following the presentation that did not not mention the new browser once. Strange, since Safari 5 has at least one killer new feature, an impressive performance boost, and a new extension architecture that users have been begging for.  </font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Safari Reader</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The most welcome of Safari's new capabilities is Reader, which gives you the ability to view long articles in an uncluttered, printed page-like view. When you land on a page, Safari's address bar pops up a gray Reader button to the right of the URL. Click on this and a pane open up with the article laid out for easy reading, while the originating page dims in the background. Fans of the superb app/web service <a href="http://www.instapaper.com/">Instapaper</a> or the <a href="http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/">Readability</a> web service will feel right at home, as the overall look is quite similar. While viewing the Reader pane, you get a hovering control bar with buttons for zooming, emailing, printing, and closing the pane to return to the original page. In my initial day of testing, I found some pages will trigger Reader while others will not, even if they both offer a similar amount of text. For example, the Personal Media Review home page comes up beautifully rendered in Reader, while my <a href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2010/04/apple_ipad_wifi.html">long-form iPad WiFi review</a> does not come up at all. I hope Apple sees fit to add a contextual menu option to force any page into Reader view. </font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Killer performance</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Google's upstart Chrome browser has been getting a lot of attention lately due primarily to its blistering speed, and Firefox also receives its share of kudos for snappy performance. According to Apple, Safari 5 now beats them both handily, with a 30% improvement over Firefox and, sadly, a mere 3% over Chrome. The comparison with Chrome is not really a fair fight, however; <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/06/02/chrome-accessibility">industry observers have pointed out</a> that Google does not support a number of Apple's OS services within Chrome, most notably OS X's superb Dictionary. Omissions such as this must have an impact on program execution but do so at the regretable expense of degrading the user experience.</font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Extension architecture</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">As any Mozilla Firefox user will glady tell you, it's the many Firefox extensions that makes the Netscape successor so popular with power users. Apple has finally listened and come up with a curated extension architecture and offers the <a href="http://developer.apple.com/programs/safari/">tools to create them for free.</a> While only a handful of extensions have been released at press time, expect hundreds in the months ahead.</font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>More Safari goodness</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Apple has also added Microsoft's Bing search service as an option to using Google or Yahoo, though Google is still the default setting - for now anyway. In the HTML5 department, Safari has added support for 17 new HTML standards including intelligent geolocation support and full-screen video rendering and a closed-captioning option in HTML5 video streams. Throw in a new Smart Address Field that finds websites when you type in the merest snippet of an address you've visited, as well as new hardware acceleration for Windows to match that capability in Mac OS X and you've got yourself a browser upgrade with serious bragging rights.<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i> ~ David MacNeill (personalmediareview@gmail.com)</i></font></p>

<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=1><i>David MacNeill produces <a href="http://personalmediareview.com/">PersonalMediaReview.com</a>, covering the tools and technologies for creating and enjoying media. He is co-founder and editor-in-chief of <a href="http://digicamera.com/">Digital Camera Magazine</a>, the first all-digital photography magazine, and executive editor of <a href="http://hhcmag.com/">Handheld Computing Magazine</a> and <a href="http://pencomputing.com/">Pen Computing Magazine</a>.</i></font></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Bill Atkinson PhotoCard for iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2010/05/review_bill_atk.html" />
<modified>2010-05-21T03:27:48Z</modified>
<issued>2010-05-10T21:41:47Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2010:/mt/6.375</id>
<created>2010-05-10T21:41:47Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> Reviewed by David MacNeill At first glance, the idea of an app that sends digital postcards via email or postal service seems like a non-starter. But Bill Atkinson PhotoCard is so compelling, inexpensive, and just plain fun that I...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/photocard1.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="0">

<strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=3>Reviewed by David MacNeill</strong></font><br />

<br /><p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">At first glance, the idea of an app that sends digital postcards via email or postal service seems like a non-starter. But <a href="http://www.billatkinson.com/aboutPhotoCard.html">Bill Atkinson PhotoCard</a> is so compelling, inexpensive, and just plain fun that I quickly found myself looking for reasons to send cards to everyone I care about. 

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"> Bill Atkinson PhotoCard is a universal app optimized for iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch that guides you through creating a postcard with photography on the front and text, stickers, and an audio attachment on the back. PhotoCards can be sent to any email address for free or to any postal address for about $2 domestic or $3 international. These custom 8.25" x 5.5" cards are printed on high quality card stock on an HP Indigo digital press, coated on both sides to survive the postal system and sent First Class. Postage is applied electronically and the first card you send from the paid version of PhotoCard is free. Of course, by printing and mailing you lose the audio attachment, though my guess is there is a way to insert a custom audio playback circuit into them in some future version of PhotoCard.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/photocard2.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="0" border="2">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Bill Atkinson is an alumnus of the legendary team that created the original Macintosh computer back in the early 1980s, leaving Apple in 1990 after 12 hyper-productive years. He has since become one of the world's most accomplished nature photographers and has pushed the craft's technical envelope, most notably in the area of extremely high-definition printing. PhotoCard, naturally, comes with a gorgeous collection of his work that you are licensed to use on your PhotoCards. The <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/bill-atkinson-photocard-lite/id356124208?mt=8">free "Lite" version</a> comes with 10 of Bill's images while the <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/bill-atkinson-photocard/id333208430?mt=8">$4.99 paid version</a> ships with 150. I will not attempt to describe his breathtaking images as it would not do them justice; click over to <a href="http://www.billatkinson.com/CatalogIndex.html"> his web gallery</a> and feast your eyes.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">PhotoCard's stickers add a dash of colorful clip art that will appeal to kids of all ages and that beats the heck out of text smileys to add a little expressiveness to your postcards. The paid version contains 350 while the free version offers 15. What I find more appealing is the dialog bubbles that contain embedded audio clips that PhotoCard lets you record on the spot. Imagine taking a photo of a park or restaurant you are visiting and then including a snippet of ambient sound to enhance your recipient's sense of being there.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/photocard3.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="0">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Laying out your postcard is easy. The app offers a selection of fonts and sizes as well as the ability to crop, rotate, and brighten or darken any photo you capture with PhotoCard or select from your personal photo library. Stickers and dialog bubbles can be placed anywhere you like and they will reposition themselves if you attempt to overlap either the address or stamp areas. To delete one, drag it off the edge of your card.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Commendably, the free version is blissfully free of ads and shares all the features of the full version with the exception of the additional photography, stickers, and free first postal card offer.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">PhotoCard works essentially the same on either iPad or iPhone, the iPad version showing off those stunning images on its big screen as well as allowing you to rotate the interface vertically so you can view both sides of your card simultaneously. Navigation could not be easier and the guided help pages are excellent. It's easy to whip up a card in a few minutes and send it off, which is consistent with what postcards have always been: a quick and informal way to tell someone you are thinking about them from wherever life takes you.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Whether PhotoCard's novelty will wear off in time remains to be seen, but I doubt that it will. A PhotoCard is infinitely more fun to send than an email with a photo attached, and there will always be those people who love to receive a beautiful photo in the mail that they can put on their refrigerator, bulletin board, or cubicle wall. In our age of ubiquitous digitization of experience, getting something tangible and beautiful from a friend delivered to your mailbox is all the more enjoyable for its rarity.<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i> ~ David MacNeill (personalmediareview@gmail.com)</i></font></p>

<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=1><i>David MacNeill produces <a href="http://personalmediareview.com/">PersonalMediaReview.com</a>, covering the tools and technologies for creating and enjoying media. He is co-founder and editor-in-chief of <a href="http://digicamera.com/">Digital Camera Magazine</a>, the first all-digital photography magazine, and executive editor of <a href="http://hhcmag.com/">Handheld Computing Magazine</a> and <a href="http://pencomputing.com/">Pen Computing Magazine</a>.</i></font></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>WaterField Ultimate SleeveCase for iPad</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2010/05/waterfield_slee.html" />
<modified>2010-05-05T22:32:10Z</modified>
<issued>2010-05-05T21:16:33Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2010:/mt/6.367</id>
<created>2010-05-05T21:16:33Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> Reviewed by David MacNeill Regular readers know that I am inordinately fond of cases and bags from San Francisco-based WaterField Designs. All their products are attractive, thoughtfully designed, made in USA, and reasonably priced. Their new line of iPad...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipad_sleevecase_md.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="0">

<strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=3>Reviewed by David MacNeill</strong></font><br />

<br /><p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Regular readers know that I am inordinately fond of cases and bags from San Francisco-based WaterField Designs. All their products are attractive, thoughtfully designed, made in USA, and reasonably priced. Their <a href="http://sfbags.com/products/ipad-cases/ipad-cases.php"> new line of iPad cases </a> are further proof of the company's dedication to delighting customers. </font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I can't really see myself carrying my iPad around town by itself in a small fitted case - I pack too much gear for that to be practical. I am used to carrying a <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/cargo/cargo.htm"> Cargo messenger bag </a>with my laptop riding in its own <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/sleevecases/sleevecases.htm"> SleeveCase</a>, so I chose to order the iPad version and stay modular.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The <a href="http://sfbags.com/products/ipad-cases/sleevecases-ipad.php"> Ultimate SleeveCase for iPad</a> case ($55) is exactly like the laptop version with the exception of having a plastic screen protector plate within the front panel. Unlike the laptop version, the iPad version can only be ordered with the flap. Though the case fits the iPad perfectly, iPads are slippery and could fall out of an open design. I ordered mine with the optional leather bottom trim and I'm glad I did: the distressed leather is thick yet soft to the touch and was definitely worth the $4 upcharge. Other options include your choice of vertical or horizontal orientation, two strap designs ($9-$19), and a clip-on pouch ($25 or $27 with leather trim). If you have a strap of your own, you can also order your case with D-rings installed for $5. There is a slip pocket on the rear panel that I use for my polishing cloth and an iPhone headset.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/sleevecase_leather_md.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="0">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I can't recommend the Ultimate SleeveCase for iPad highly enough. It provides excellent protection for your iPad and can be used inside any kind of bag, briefcase, or backpack you prefer. If you like to travel light, order it with a strap and a pouch. Either way, you have a discreet, durable way to pack your new toy through the big bad world.<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i> ~ David MacNeill (personalmediareview@gmail.com)</i></font></p>

<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=1><i>David MacNeill produces <a href="http://personalmediareview.com/">PersonalMediaReview.com</a>, covering the tools and technologies for creating and enjoying media. He is co-founder and editor-in-chief of <a href="http://digicamera.com/">Digital Camera Magazine</a>, the first all-digital photography magazine, and executive editor of <a href="http://hhcmag.com/">Handheld Computing Magazine</a> and <a href="http://pencomputing.com/">Pen Computing Magazine</a>.</i></font></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Textie for iPhone: Unlimited free texting</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2010/04/textie_for_ipho.html" />
<modified>2010-05-05T22:00:54Z</modified>
<issued>2010-04-29T20:44:19Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2010:/mt/6.345</id>
<created>2010-04-29T20:44:19Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> Reviewed by David MacNeill AT$T charges my three-phone family $30 per month for unlimited texting. Considering that one of us is a tweenie, I suppose that&apos;s not too horribly overpriced; I&apos;m sure my lovely daughter will soon be texting...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/textie1.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="0">

<strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=3>Reviewed by David MacNeill</strong></font><br />

<br /><p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">AT$T charges my three-phone family $30 per month for unlimited texting. Considering that one of us is a tweenie, I suppose that's not too horribly overpriced; I'm sure my lovely daughter will soon be texting hundreds of messages every day. But the vast bulk of my texts are sent to my wife and to my editor, both of whom carry iPhones, making us all perfect candidates for a sweet new iPhone app called <a href="http://textie.me/">Textie</a>. <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/textie-messaging/id353912946?mt=8">Download it from iTunes</a>, sync with your iPhone, set up a free account using your email address and mobile number, then talk you your iPhone-packing friends and family to do the same. </font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/textie3.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="0">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The app is extremely clean and easy to use, resembling the iPhone's inbuilt Messaging app. You can attach photos to your texts, either snapping a fresh one from within Textie or grabbing one from your library. If your intended recipient has not installed Textie or does not have an iPhone, your message is sent to them as an email or standard SMS, depending on how you addressed your message to them. They can then reply directly to your Textie handle.
</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">It just works, or at least it did until the Textie servers got hammered today from all the rave press the app is getting. I was able to use it without incident on my iPad as well, though it looked rather ratty scaled up. Can a proper iPad version be far behind? Textie is free with occasional ads interspersed among your texts, or ad-free for $1.99. <p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i> ~ David MacNeill (personalmediareview@gmail.com)</i></font></p>

<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=1><i>David MacNeill produces <a href="http://personalmediareview.com/">PersonalMediaReview.com</a>, covering the tools and technologies for creating and enjoying media. He is co-founder and editor-in-chief of <a href="http://digicamera.com/">Digital Camera Magazine</a>, the first all-digital photography magazine, and executive editor of <a href="http://hhcmag.com/">Handheld Computing Magazine</a> and <a href="http://pencomputing.com/">Pen Computing Magazine</a>.</i></font></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Apple iPad WiFi 64GB</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2010/04/apple_ipad_wifi.html" />
<modified>2010-06-14T19:41:18Z</modified>
<issued>2010-04-22T23:57:37Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2010:/mt/6.342</id>
<created>2010-04-22T23:57:37Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> Reviewed by David MacNeill Sunday morning I awoke to a choice: either wait a week for Apple to send me an iPad, or drive 602 miles round-trip to buy one today and get to work writing this review tonight....</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/iPad iPhone MacBook Pro.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=3>Reviewed by David MacNeill</strong></font><br />

<br /><p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Sunday morning I awoke to a choice: either wait a week for Apple to send me an iPad, or drive 602 miles round-trip to buy one today and get to work writing this review tonight. Actually there was no choice at all — I gulped a second cup of coffee and hit the road.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The smallish Best Buy in Idaho Falls had the only iPads available to purchase for a thousand miles around my current residence in Boise, perhaps due to them receiving their shipment later than the big city stores. Several phone calls confirmed that the few they had were going fast and that Apple had forbidden all stores from accepting payment over the phone or even reserving iPads for later pickup. I could only hope there would be one left for me when I arrived; there was no guarantee I would bring home the bacon. </font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I was not to be disappointed. It turned out that I had my choice of all three models and decided to spring for the 64GB iPad ($699) and a dock ($29), the only iPad accessory they had left on the shelf. I wolfed a celebratory burger, gassed up my trusty old Honda, and drove home with a new computing platform on the passenger seat.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/home landscape.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>What is iPad?</strong></font><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">iPad is a 24-ounce wireless tablet computer running the iPhone OS, a variant of Mac OS X that is not designed to run standard Mac OS X software made for desktop and laptop computers. The iPad is positioned as a portable, lightweight device for web browsing, email and chat communication, and media enjoyment in the form of digitized books, music, video, photos, games, television shows, and theatrical films. Secondarily, iPads are intended to be used for common office productivity using word processors, spreadsheets, and presentation tools. Beyond that, iPad is a platform for a new kind of software experience navigated entirely with one’s fingertips.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Laying down 200 additional bucks for the extra memory space turned out to be a good move. After the first sync my media promptly ate up well over half the memory and I haven't even downloaded any theatrical length movies yet! It took about 45 minutes, with a 28GB iTunes music database of 4427 tracks including 93 mixed audio and video podcasts, as well as my 25GB iPhoto photo library of 8,326 stills and 178 short VGA-resolution digital camera videos. I had downloaded a couple dozen iPad apps the night before, all of which synced along with my collection of roughly three dozen standard iPhone apps. Everything worked flawlessly the first time — impressive!</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/iTunes sync.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">If you opt for the 16GB or 32GB model, help is at hand for those with large media libraries. In iTunes 9.1 there is a new “Prefer standard definition videos” as well as the option to convert higher bit rate songs to 128 Kbps AAC, an option that originated with the current iPod nano but is now available to all devices. </font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Kick back</font></strong><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Fully synced and connected to my home 802.11g network, I kicked back in my battered old Norwegian leather recliner and got to work. My strongest first impression is how different the iPad is from any other large mobile computer I have ever used, except one: the Newton eMate 300 from 1997. What makes these two machines stand out is a certain relaxed character about them, a coolness. Conventional laptops, even those from Apple, give off a kind of “Lets get to work and be super-productive!” vibe. They sit there, battery meter running down, hard drive whining and fans spinning, subtly guilt-tripping you into Getting Something Done — it's like they are impatiently tapping their foot.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Sitting with an iPad is profoundly calming by comparison. The battery lasts essentially forever, the smaller screen doesn't block out half the room around you, and the silence makes you forget you are in command of millions upon millions of transistors pumping countless electrons around the world at the speed of light. For most us, keyboards are forever associated with work and productivity, so not having one staring at you leaves your options open. Call up Mr. Qwerty if you need to, but otherwise make him go away, please!</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Finding a comfortable position was easy. Knees slightly up, the iPad rests nicely in your lap. Turn it sideways and two-handed typing feels surprisingly natural. I am not a talented touch typist, but I can type as fast as I can think and found the iPad’s virtual keyboard to be no detectable hindrance to my writing. I quickly found that tossing the iPad aside to attend to other things around the house was reflexive and stressless — I simply did not think about the tablet at all until I returned, however long I was away. With a click and a swipe, I was right where I left off instantaneously. This is the way personal computing is supposed to be. </font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/iPad side angle.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Physical highlights</font></strong></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Overall Feel: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">In your hands, an iPad has some interesting properties, all positive. It is slightly heavier than people expect the first time they hold it, though more suggesting solidity than mere weight. The display glass is somewhat thicker than the current iPhone in order to create more stiffness to the center so it does not indent when pressed. Combined with the wide, thin lithium-polymer battery pack and the unibody aluminum shell, the thing feels more like it was grown than assembled from many pieces. The overall impression is of an organic balance and a reassuring tautness.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Multitouch: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Millions of us are used to the miracle of multitouch from years of iPhone use. Multitouch on an iPad is like discovering it again. The responsiveness of this display paired with the excellent performance of the Apple A4 processor (more on this below) will raise your eyebrows and perhaps even make you involuntarily say “Woah!” It is neuron-speed response, lag-free and intensely satisfying. This is the “magical” part of the “magical and revolutionary” message Apple is promoting in its marketing materials.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/iPad back and side.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Dual speakers: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The dual speaker array on the lower-right edge produces surprisingly loud and full audio. The drivers are mounted sideways facing horn that channel sound out to the three ports — why three and not two? Only Johnny Ive and Steve Jobs know. The speakers resonate strongly within the iPad so you feel the rumble of low tones through the shell, providing haptic feedback when playing games that involve holding the iPad. </font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Display: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Apple chose to use a 9.7-inch, LED-backlit, 1024x768 In-Plane Switching (IPS) LCD display on the iPad, perhaps not the best choice in regards to power consumption but this tech has other qualities that more than compensate. IPS was developed by Hitachi in the mid-1990s for high-end desktop displays for the graphics market, where its rich 8-bit color and extreme viewing angles — up to 178 degrees — on all four sides gave it a distinct advantage over the conventional LCD technologies of the day. Prices were initially quite high but have since settled; the iPad display costs about $60 in quantity. Compared to 6-bit twisted nematic (TN) displays common on netbooks, the IPS is in another league entirely. Incidentally, the latest iMacs use IPS displays as well.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Some reviewers have bemoaned the iPad’s glossy screen and its tendency to attract smudges. This is the same oleophobic (oil repelling) coating Apple deployed on the iPhone 3GS glass and is a great leap beyond earlier iPhone screens. It is tough and easy to clean with a quick wipe. The glossiness, though admittedly highly reflective when dark or turned off, is perfectly opaque when in normal use. Had Apple chosen a matte-finished coating, the iPad’s visual impact would have been dulled as well. Don’t get me wrong; I prefer the matte display coating on my MacBook Pro and will gladly pay extra to have my future laptops built to order with them. But on the iPad, the glossy screen looks and feels great to me. I carry a microfiber cloth for my reading glasses anyway so now it keeps my iPad clean as well. For those who really, really can’t stand the occasional glare there are already matte skins on the market.</font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Living with the iPad</font></strong><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I have spent a week with the iPad, every spare waking minute I could find. I took notes on everything but did not sit down to write the body of this review until the shine had worn off a bit. I even took it to my day job so I could gauge reactions from employees (most of whom are half my age) and so I could take notes while on breaks. Everyone who saw it commented on its beauty and coolness of course, but the universal opinion these people brought to the party was that it was too costly for what it offers. This, I explained to any who would listen, is nonsense. I advised taking ten minutes to browse though the App Store and look at the what thousands of brilliant developers have created before deciding the worth of the device and how it could fit into their life. The iPad is most definitely not a giant iPod touch or iPhone, nor is it a netbook without a keyboard, nor is it a Tablet PC or some kind of MacBook slate. The iPad is something entirely new. It looks a bit like a duck and can quack like a duck but it is not limited to being a mere duck.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Though the tablet form factor has been with us since the early 1990s, none of these early machines were as daringly different because they could not have been: without widespread wireless internet connectivity through WiFi and cellular data, an iPad could not exist. Had the brilliantly prescient but sadly ill-fated Newton platform of the mid-nineties survived into the new millennium, it clearly would have morphed into the iPad. Lacking a wireless infrastructure doomed this promising technology; Newton was simply born prematurely.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">One of the strongest indications that we are not dealing with a conventional personal computer is the file system, or rather, the apparent lack of one. Your files are stored within the applications — there is no Finder composed of nested folders. And at this point in iPad’s development you can only see documents within each app. Want to open an RTF doc in Pages? Can’t do it. You can tell iTunes to sync it over but it won’t be there when you launch Pages. You will have to convert these files to the .pages format. Within a week of the launch, several utility apps became available for sale as workarounds, the most popular of which as of this writing is GoodReader ($.99), a sort of Swiss Army knife document manager and PDF viewer.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/iTunes file sharing.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">As a personal challenge I wrote the bulk of this review on my iPad in Pages ($10), using   it as a straight text editor rather than a template-driven page processor. I found the iPad version of Pages inviting and easy to work with, with one glaring exception: file syncing. Or rather, the lack of it. What Apple calls “file sharing” here is extremely crude, though it does kind of work. You can import and export copies of your documents through the App section of iTunes, but this is nothing like true syncing. You end up with a bunch of successive copies of each document and it’s up to you to figure out which is the most recent on both machines. It’s as big a kludge as the awful Newton Connection Kit was — clearly a work in progress that will surely be addressed in future updates. Until then, I recommend just emailing drafts back and forth as needed, since you will have a clear time stamp on each copy in your mailbox.</font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Core iPad apps</font></strong><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Future reviews will cover all manner of iPad apps in appropriate depth, but at this early date I will briefly cover only the core Apple iPhone OS 3.2 apps.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app weather.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Safari: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Essentially this is iPhone Safari scaled up. Several interface elements have been shifted around, most notably the toolbar’s move to the top of the screen. You can also set your bookmarks bar to stay visible, though this is off by default. Due to the larger memory requirements of the larger screen, you can still open eight web pages and switch between them easily, but after three or four the remaining will be flushed from the frame buffers. They remain as an icon but when you tap them they reload from scratch — not a huge issue but still worth noting if you tend to have lots of pages open simultaneously.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app mail.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Mail: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">If you are a heavy email user — and who isn’t these days? — you will love the expanded version of iPhone Mail on the iPad. While we have yet to enjoy a unified inbox, the accounts popover window in portrait orientation becomes a full-fledged pane in landscape, occupying the left third of the screen, leaving the rest for the email you currently have in view. It’s a much more efficient environment to work in.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app notes.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Notes: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Like Mail, Notes displays your note list on the left and your current note on the right. The interface now mimics a leather portfolio, with the list inserted into a stitched pocket. The current note is outlined in faux red marker, a welcome touch. Beyond that, it’s the same old Notes.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app itunes 1.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>iPod: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">This app is laid out very differently than on the iPhone and iPod touch. It took me a few minutes to get my bearings, but once I had the lay of the land it made perfect sense. One big change is the relocation of all video content to the Videos app. You can see video podcasts in iPod but when you tap them they launch in Videos. All music videos are in Videos as well and cannot be launched from iPod.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">It's great to see album art on the big iPad screen, and the sound quality from the side-firing dual speaker array is surprisingly loud and sweet and the audio output to my AKG K271 studio reference headphones is indistinguishable from my iPhone 3GS.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app calendar.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Calendar: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">This app is a dramatic enhancement to the small screen version and clearly demonstrates the critical concepts laid out in Apple's iPad User interface guidelines:</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><em>~ Make sure the user's data is always central to the experience.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">~ Flatten the information hierarchy so more data can be viewed on one screen.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">~ Incorporate real world elements whenever possible to enhance the experience.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">~ Always preserve the user's current state so they can resume seamlessly.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">~ Avoid gratuitous changes to the screen that distract from the experience.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">~ Make it beautiful.</em></font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Aesthetically, Calendar is now a cross between a traditional paper organizer and iCal on the Mac, offering split screens in landscape view that are packed with information and delightfully easy on the eyes. Facing a crazy-busy day is only made easier when viewed this way. </font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app contacts.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Contacts: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Like Calendar, Contacts has been enhanced to look like a real world Little Black Book.  In either orientation the interface is identical, with a narrow column on the left listing contacts and the rest of the screen sowing the current contact's information. Groups are accessed by a handy crimson bookmark on the upper left — an attractive touch. </font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app photos 2.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Photos: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Another major improvement that really shows off the iPad at its best. Albums and Events are shown as stacks, slightly askew as they would be on a table. You can tap on a photo to enlarge it, or use the spread-finger method to zoom it. Slideshows work pretty much as in iPhoto. It’s very responsive and way more fun than browsing through your library in iPhoto. The tactile nature of interaction in this app works beautifully.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app videos.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Videos: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Not much to talk about here. It is similar to Photos but without any fancy displays, just a tab bar across the top for Rentals, Movies, TV Shows, Podcasts, and Music Videos.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app maps.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Maps: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">This app has changed the least of any of the majors. It is just like the iPhone version, only larger and noticeably faster. Only thing I missed was the Route By Bicycle option Google Maps just recently added.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app youtube.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>YouTube: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"> <font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Again we have an iPhone app essentially enhanced only to make sense on the larger screen. One welcome feature is the ability to view videos in either portrait or landscape.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app ibooks enders game.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>iBooks: </strong><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Though technically not a core app since it must be downloaded and installed, iBooks, and the iBookstore library it connects to, is Apple’s foray into the realm of digital book readers such as Amazon’s popular Kindle. Replicating the wildly successful iTunes Store model, iBooks stands to make iPad the dominant player in this space. In addition to thousands of current titles, iBookstore provides access to a library of public domain titles for free.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The iBook reading experience is extremely pleasant, with iPad’s bright, colorful screen making even plain text look fabulous. Though not as crisp as the Kindle's monochrome eInk display, the color LCD more than compensates. Pages turn convincingly, following your finger precisely and even showing a bit of type bleed from the opposing page as it turns. Navigation is simple, using an always present bar across the bottom of the page. You can create your own bookmarks by selecting passages and tapping an icon at the top of the page. This is as close as one can get to the experience of reading a hardback book available on any electronic device. It is thoroughly immersive, easy on the eyes, and comfortable to hold for hours.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">What’s missing in the app department compared to the iPhone 3GS? Clock, Calculator, Weather, Compass, Voice Memos, and Stocks. These apps are all better suited to display on a small screen — 1024x768 would be too much. It makes sense to speculate these will all become Dashboard-like widgets in a future iPad OS update. Since all core iPad apps use the entire screen, some kind of smaller window design for applets like these seems likely.</font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Specs, SOCs, and silicon sandwiches</font></strong><br /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">One only has to spend a few minutes ogling the <a href="http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPad-Teardown/2183/1iFixIt.com">iFixIt iPad Teardown</a> to see that this is a silicon sandwich: a lean circuit board encased by a huge flat battery on one side and a huge flat display on the other. The logic board is built around a new Apple A4 processor running at 1GHz, 400 MHz faster than the similar chip at the heart of the iPhone 3GS. There is 256MB of RAM (just like the iPhone 3GS) and your choice of 16, 32, or 64MB of flash memory for storage — think of it as a silicon hard drive. The degree of integration on this logic board is astonishing even to non-geeks. One would think a board with so few chips would power a CD player, not a computer, but its apparent simplicity is deceptive. That A4 is not merely a state-of-the-art mobile microprocessor but a system on a chip (SOC) with a powerful graphics coprocessor on the same silicon wafer. There is also solid evidence for one or more additional logic modules sleeping within the A4, since the 45-nanometer die has room for roughly a third more transistors than required for the CPU and GPU modules we know about. Speculation about a hidden third processor abound, but since only Apple knows the code to release such a beastie only time will tell.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/video tron.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Tips and tricks</font></strong><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">1: Want to reset your iPad? Hold down the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button for several seconds until the Slide to Power Off slider appears.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">2: Need to force quit a rogue app? Do the same sequence as the reset, the press and hold the Home button until the foreground app quits.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">3: To quickly mute the device, press the down volume button for two seconds. </font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">4: Select text quickly by double-tapping to select a word and quadruple-tapping to select whole paragraphs.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">5: The iPad’s Dock ships with four app icons installed, but you can add any two additional icons by pressing and holding an icon until it wiggles, then dragging it to the dock. When you’re done, stop the gyrations by pressing the Home button.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">6: To quickly scroll to the top of a long web page, don’t bother rowing all the way back up there with your finger, just tap Safari’s title bar text.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">7: Screen shots can be captured by clicking the Sleep/Wake and Home buttons simultaneously, the result of which are saved to your photo library and synced back to your main computer.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">8: Like the iPhone virtual keyboard, the iPad’s keyboard has numerous shortcuts to less common keys that are accessed by simply pressing and holding a key, revealing a pop-up list. Open the keyboard in any app, then press and hold on each key for a moment and see what pops up. The one I use most often is the apostrophe: press and hold the comma key and up pops the handy apostrophe.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app netflix.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Things that could be better</font></strong><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">There have been some reports of WiFi range issues but in my testing on both Apple and non-Apple wireless hubs I experiencded range and speeds comparable to my MacBook Pro. I suspect this may be related to a known software issue with IP addresses that has caused iPads to be temporarily restricted from use on campus wireless networks at Cornell, George Washington, Princeton, and many others. At press time Apple had not commented on the issue, which is caused by an iPad neglecting to release its temporary IP address after the DHCP server expires the address. I predict Apple will push out a minor software update to all iPads shortly. The iPad’s dual WiFi antennae are located behind the large Apple logo on the back and under the front display bezel to the left of the Home button, so there is plenty of coverage on both sides of the tablet; it does not seem likely this is a hardware issue.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">There is clear evidence of some functionality being left out to make the hardware launch deadline. Several ordinary, everyday apps are inexplicably missing in action. No PDF viewer? No text editor except for the cute but rather lame Notes? And no iDisk support and no ability to mount the iPad as a virtual disk on the desktop...really?</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">There is also reason to assume Apple left some accessories out of the retail box to drive add-on sales. Even though there is plenty of room for it in the retail box, there is no extension cord for the AC power adapter — but you get one with the optional iPad 10w USB Power Adapter ($29). And no earbuds? They ship with $59 iPod shuffles, so how much can they cost to make in mass quantities? A buck? A buck and a quarter? The lack of an iPad Dock in the box I can forgive since Apple probably believes a sizable percentage of buyers will opt for the iPad Keyboard Dock instead. (The iPad Dock, incidentally, will not accept an iPhone or iPod touch because they are thicker at the edges than iPads.) I can also understand the lack of an included carrying case since Apple does not want to stifle the huge third-party case market, but how about throwing in a simple microfiber slipcase, or even a cleaning cloth? Would including those obvious little amenities break the bank, Apple?</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Annoyingly, caps lock is disabled by default but can be enabled in Keyboard settings to work just as it does on the iPhone, with a double-tap. Alternatively, you can hold either shift key down as you type to get an all-caps string.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The iPad appears to lack a built-in help system.  If you aren't connected to the net, no help for you!</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Start an attachment download then switch to another app and you will discover the download has aborted upon returning to Mail. However, starting a purchase download using the App Store works fine in the background if you switch to another app at any point in the download — weird.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app pandora.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Sober up</font></strong><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">There is one good thing about being a little late to the party: you will always be more sober than everyone else. I have the advantage of having read every major iPad review written in the week since the April 3 release. Several common themes arise, all of them stemming from a fundamental misunderstanding of what the iPad actually is and where it fits into the grand parade of personal computing. </font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">For example, many have decried the lack of USB ports, a camera, and an SD Card slot — all features better suited to conventional computers. As a true <em>tabula rasa</em>, the iPad needs to be more future-proof than that. All of these features are subject to rapid revision and obsolescence — this year’s must-have feature is next year’s useless port. Apple’s standard 30-pin connector interface provides access to anything in the iPad through the use of small, inexpensive adapters. As Version 1.0 of a game-changing computing platform, I feel it befits the machine to have no control or physical feature that is likely to be readily outmoded. Another advantage to this approach is the reduced number of entry points for contaminants like water and dust. And of course, there is the aesthetic purity of a seamless aluminum/glass object that isn’t riddled with a dozen ugly holes and festooned with icons. In ten years, you’ll pull out your old 2010 iPad and it will neither look, nor will it be, substantially dated. Have a look at a common laptop from 1999 to experience the opposite effect. If the price of such aesthetic longevity is the cost of a couple of $29 adapters, I’m okay with that.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/app comics.png" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>Summer blockbuster: iPhone OS 4</font></strong><br /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">But it’s not all bad news. Days after the iPad launch, Apple announced the specs of iPhone OS 4, due this Summer. This is a major update that will install on iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPad, and third-generation iPod touch devices. There is almost certainly going to be a new iPhone released at the same time, generally predicted to be named iPhone HD. [UPDATE: On June 7, Apple announced the iPhone 4 and changed the name of the operating system used on the iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch to iOS 4.]</font></p> 

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Of particular interest to iPad owners is the new multitasking feature which will allow us to have select apps running in the background, such as chat, IP voice apps, and popular streaming music apps such as Pandora. There will also be a major upgrade to the Mail app including the much-requested universal inbox showing all your incoming messages at a glance. To help manage the overwhelming tide of apps, iPhone OS 4 will introduce app folders to keep things tidy.</font></p>

<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=4>A clean break</font></strong><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Perhaps it is not surprising that the iPad feels relatively polished and complete compared to other first iterations of new classes of computers: the iPad is not so much a large iPod touch as the iPod touch is a small iPad, a proof of concept. Thus, much of the groundwork has already been done on a scale model of sorts. [UPDATE: This prediction was confirmed by Steve Jobs on June 1, stating that the iPad concept preceeded the iPhone.]</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">From a developers viewpoint, this is a rare opportunity to help reinvent the software experience. The iPad platform eliminates most of the annoying and dangerous problems in personal computer software. For example, there is no file system to deal with. Gone are the days when you have to spend hours on the phone guiding people through volumes and folders. Users don’t even have to remember to save their work — ever. And since each app is “sandboxed” and cannot interact with other apps or the operating system, security breaches are history. How many times have you had to teach someone how to quit background apps they are using to free up resources? The iPad takes care of that too. And the simplicity of the platform along with its built-in distribution system brings software costs down to a fraction of what they have been. Bye-bye boxed software!</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/iPad/elise with iPad.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">This is a clean break with the personal computer as we have known it for over three decades. On an iPad, the hardware disappears and the software becomes the computer. Whatever app you start is the interface, the whole experience. To compare an iPad to any conventional portable computer makes little sense. As ever more interesting and innovative apps come into being for iPad that just could not exist for any other computer, this will become increasingly obvious to everyone. <p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i> ~ David MacNeill (personalmediareview@gmail.com)</i></font></p>

<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=1><i>David MacNeill produces <a href="http://personalmediareview.com/">PersonalMediaReview.com</a>, covering the tools and technologies for creating and enjoying media. He is co-founder and editor-in-chief of <a href="http://digicamera.com/">Digital Camera Magazine</a>, the first all-digital photography magazine, and executive editor of <a href="http://hhcmag.com/">Handheld Computing Magazine</a> and <a href="http://pencomputing.com/">Pen Computing Magazine</a>.</i></font></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Waterfield Personal Muzetto Man Bag</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2009/06/waterfield_pers.html" />
<modified>2009-06-15T22:29:24Z</modified>
<issued>2009-06-15T17:11:46Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2009:/mt/6.304</id>
<created>2009-06-15T17:11:46Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Confession: I have carried various man-bags for many years but not so much lately. In part because of the occasional snickers I have gotten from good ol&apos; boys in the parochial city I live in and the rest due to...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<p>Confession: I have carried various man-bags for many years but not so much lately. In part because of the occasional snickers I have gotten from good ol' boys in the parochial city I live in and the rest due to the highly changeable weather here that usually dictates that I carry a jacket providing all the cargo capacity I need. But there are many situations that are well served by a bag and I dislike carrying bulky stuff in my pockets. A new day job has me packing my lunch every day, so if I am going to carry a bag anyway it might as well be a cool one. The search was on! </p>

<p>I started with a vertical, all-nylon unisex bag from InCase that I bought several years ago. The futuristic, silver-grey material now looked way too big-city for me and worse, it was festooned with gimmicky little cellphone pockets, zippers, and secret compartments. The slick nylon had not aged well either. Only natural materials gain character with use, while synthetics just get shabby. Pass.</p>

<p>Next I found a faded tan canvas vertical at The Gap. One large compartment, two small pockets inside, and zero structure. Everything just dropped to the bottom and bulged out. It had a big brass buckle, distressed leather edges on the flap -- definitely masculine. It was cheap and I needed something to haul my daily stuff, so I bought it. I quickly found out that it was anything but weather-proof, and that the plastic clip buckles that hold down the flap are easily broken since they are attached to the bottom and take a beating every time you set the bag down.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/muzetto1.jpg"><br />
<br/></p>

<p>When I saw that <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/index.htm">WaterField Designs</a> had a new line of man-bags coming out, I requested a review sample of the smallest one, the <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/muzetto/muzetto.htm">Personal Muzetto</a> ($179), measuring 10.5 x 8.5 x 1.5 inches. I have always gravitated to the most compact case I can find that will carry what I need. This works both ways, forcing me to pare down to the essentials and not pack loads of unnecessary stuff -- that's what women's purses are for. (Just kidding.) </p>

<p>Like everything I've seen from WaterField, the Muzetto is a beautiful piece of American-made craft. The attention to detail is exemplary with nary a flaw in stitching or materials. The rich brown leather reminds me of a well-loved baseball glove. The interior is the same taxi-yellow weave material they use in their larger bags, the light color making it much easier to find things inside. The inside of the flap is of a textured, tough nylon and can be ordered in a variety of cool outdoorsy colors, but I chose basic black.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/muzetto3.jpg"><br />
<br/></p>

<p>So what makes a man-bag not a purse? Design. The squared off edges, vertical orientation, and ballistic nylon shoulder strap make a clear statement that this is not a feminine accessory. I asked several women in my life their opinion and it was unanimous: none of them would think of carrying a Muzetto. It has a slightly military vibe to it, purposeful and unadorned if you go with a Black or Copper colored inside flap and somewhat less so if you opt for Green, Flame, Pine, or Pearl.</p>

<p>It was raining the first day I used the Muzetto, but rather than stress about the leather getting water damaged I just threw my stuff in the bag and headed out for my day. A real man-bag should not have to be pampered. I toss mine around and don't worry about it at all, and after two weeks of this I can report that It looks better than new. The leather is so well-oiled that it repairs itself. Most minor scratches and scuffs just disappear, and those few that don't just add more tough-guy character. Splashes and rain do not stain it and the cargo inside stays dry. Even in a hard wind, the heavy flap design stays down without any need for a fiddly fastener or card-killing magnet. The adjustable shoulder strap has a removable matching leather shoulder pad back with rubber. It stays put on your shoulder when you swing the bag around to use it.</p>

<p>The Personal Muzetto has a four pocket layout that I use thus, back to front:</p>

<p>• Rear pocket for folded papers, 3x5 note cards, and receipts.</p>

<p>• Main interior chamber holds a <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/gearpouch/gearpouch.htm">WaterFIeld Small Gear Pouch</a> ($19) to organize my cables, adapters, a <a href="http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/powerduoiphone">Griffin PowerDuo iPhone charger</a> ($39.99), <a href="http://www.leatherman.com/multi-tools/keychain-tools/micra.aspx">Leatherman Micra multi-tool</a>, guitar capos, <a href="http://hearos.com/earplugs/products-00211.html">Hearos ear plugs</a>, and some personal hygiene items. The remaining half of the main chamber carries my lunch.</p>

<p>• The smaller zippered pocket within the main chamber holds my <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/wallets/wallets.htm">WaterField Leather Wallet</a> ($19) and my battered old Levenger Bavarian Key and Coin case, the original slim version they no longer offer.</p>

<p>• The front padded pocket just under the main flap is perfect for my <a href="HTTP://www.levenger.com/PAGETEMPLATES/PRODUCT/Product.asp?Params=Category=15-100|Level=2-3|PageID=6584">Levenger Double Zip Eyeglass Case</a>, my iPhone in a <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/iphonesuedejacket/iphonesuedejacket.htm">WaterField iPhone Suede Jacket</a> ($9), and a <a href="http://www.cross.com/catalog/pendetail.aspx?cat_name=ATX+Pens&id=885-1">Cross ATX pen</a> clipped to the edge for quick access.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/muzetto2.jpg"><br />
<br/></p>

<p>An organization trick I often use is to nest a small personal bag into a larger laptop bag. This keeps the essentials separated from the big iron making it easy to haul what I need and only what I need. Turns out a Personal Muzetto fits nicely into the front pocket of my medium-size <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/cargo/cargo.htm">WaterField Cargo Messenger</a> ($199) where my MacBook Pro lives, safe in a fitted  <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/sleevecases/sleevecases.htm">WaterField Sleeve</a> ($57 with the optional flap and worth every penny.)</p>

<p>The things we carry change over time. A bag that fits your stuff today may not fit tomorrow.  A truly great bag is one that carries one's personal items for many years. Through some combination of talents, the designer sees what will work going forward and measures accordingly. When he uses excellent materials and cuts no corners putting it all together, the result is a classic. You grow attached to such timeless things. It exceeds your expectations and gives service far beyond anything promised. And such things do not necessarily cost more than cheap transient Chinese crap -- over the long run, that is. The only reason you ever have to buy a classic more than once is if it gets lost or stolen, never because it fell apart, its looks grew tiresome, or its pockets are too era-specific to hold your this year's gear.</p>

<p>Is $179 too much to spend on a man bag? You'll have to make that call for yourself. Remember: You only have to pay once. The Muzetto is built to last functionally, endure aesthetically, and to age gracefully. And that's what I tell myself every time I buy from WaterField. Everything they make that I've held in my hands is simply great and the Muzetto is no exception.</p>

<p><i>~David MacNeill</i></p>

<p><a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/muzetto/muzetto.htm">WaterField Designs Muzetto</a></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>New Life For Your Old TiVo</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2008/03/new_life_for_yo.html" />
<modified>2008-03-21T22:14:33Z</modified>
<issued>2008-03-21T16:59:22Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2008:/mt/6.188</id>
<created>2008-03-21T16:59:22Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> My five year-old Sony SVR-3000 TiVo went south. The 80GB hard drive just up and died with no warning at all. Just wouldn&apos;t boot and made nasty clicking sounds. I have a nine-year old daughter who absolutely MUST have...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/tivo/weaknees.jpg" align="right" hspace="4"><br />
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">My five year-old Sony SVR-3000 TiVo went south. The 80GB hard drive just up and died with no warning at all. Just wouldn't boot and made nasty clicking sounds. I have a nine-year old daughter who absolutely MUST have her Hannah Montana, so I had to move fast or risk major domestic unrest.</p></p>

<p>I seemed to me that this scenario must be playing out in thousands of households right about now. There were boatloads of TiVo Series II units sold around the time we bought ours and all those hard drives are winking out all over the world, slowly but surely. So I decided to build this article based on the experience of replacing the drive.</p>

<p>Google "TiVo replacement drive" and you'll find a number of companies that specialize in TiVo upgrades and repairs. I chose DVRUpgrade.com and Weaknees.com since they looked like the most established operations. Contacted both and made arrangements for replacement drives, pre-imaged with the TiVo software specifically for my Sony. Hard drive capacities have jumped dramatically since I bought my TiVo, so I opted for a 400GB replacement from both companies. Since I always record at Best Quality, I went from about 20 hours to nearly 120 hours, a huge improvement that has dramatically changed the way I used my TiVo -- more on that later.</p></p>

<p>I ordered the same upgrade kit from each firm on the same day and received both boxes at the same time a couple days later via UPS. Both kits cost $199 with free ground shipping. The drives were the same too: 7200RPM Seagate DB35 mechanisms designed specifically for use in consumer media devices. Yes, you can shove just about any drive into a TiVo, but using a drive made for the task will yield smoother video performance and a quieter living room. Such drives can be difficult if not impossible to find in retail outlets, so it's best to get them from companies like the two I chose. The 400GB drive I chose can be purchased unformatted for $169, but then you'll have to spend another $20 for software specific to your TiVo model, get it all hooked up to your home computer, then do the image transfer -- not pretty. Of the two companies only DVRUpgrade.com offers do it yourself software installers. Though I briefly considered going this route, it saves a mere $20 and I'd have to borrow a Windows box to accomplish it. Our computers are all Macs and though we have a couple of Windows laptops lying around gathering dust, you need a desktop machine to do the deed. It's too much hassle for me to save a mere $20.</p></p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/tivo/instructions.jpg" align="right" hspace="4"><br />
<p>The out-of-box experience from both firms was virtually identical. The Weaknees kit included an "Upgraded By Weaknees.com" sticker for your TiVo and a hint card showing how to change your remote's Skip button into a handy 30-second skip. Both offer a one-page instruction sheet detailing exactly how to open the unit, remove the old drive, install the new one, and close it all up without binding any cables or forgetting to plug anything into the right socket. It almost could not have been easier. All you need is a simple screwdriver and basic manual dexterity. I was able to complete the task within ten minutes both times, and I was dawdling and taking notes the whole time.</p><br />
<br /><br />
<p><font size="3" face="Trebuchet MS"><b>Just Like New</b></font><br />
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Once you have your TiVo bolted back together, just plug it into your home theater system  and turn it on. The experience that follows is exactly the same as if you had just bought a brand new TiVo from the store. Answer a question about your zip code, tell it how you connect to your system and identify your cable channel lineup, and TiVo does the rest. You lose all your stored programs, recording schedules and preferences, but look at it as an opportunity to clear out the old commercial network crap you've been watching and replace it with lots of public television -- I'm only half kidding here. Make a promise to yourself that you will not waste any more of your precious life watching bad television shows. TV is 90% wasteland but the other 10% can be a very good use of your time and that of your family. End of sermon.</p></p>

<p>Once you are up and running again, behold the vast amount of space you now have. Suddenly, you chose to set your Season Pass settings to "Keep Until I Delete", saving interesting programs for months instead of days. I found myself casually working my way through my favorite channel's upcoming shows, selecting anything of even remote interest to me of others in the house. Why not? Anything that turns out to be junk is easily deleted, and there is now plenty of space for it all. I also left TiVo Suggestions on, something I have never done because it tended to fill my old drive up so quickly. In a few days the system had suggested a number of excellent programs we would have otherwise missed.</p>

<p>Of course, you don't need to wait until your old drive dies to reap the benefits of an upgrade. The massive capacity and smoother performance you'll enjoy is worth the money. Both the companies I worked with offer excellent kits but I would suggest checking both sites and look for special offers before you order. As I write this, Weaknees.com had a sweet deal on their 500GB upgrade kit: $229 pre-imaged for your device.</p><br />
<br /><br />
<p><font size="3" face="Trebuchet MS"><b>Second Drive Option for TiVo Junkies</b></font><br />
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">If you are a serious TiVo junkie, another option is to add a second drive to your rig. Not all TiVo units can physically accommodate a second drive, so check the Weaknees.com and DVRUpgrade.com sites to find out if your unit can handle it. While it is certainly possible to simply order a second drive and install it, this is not the most desirable method. You'll have two drives of differing ages and performance, one of which will eventually fail and take down both drives in the process. You also have a fair bit of low-level drive tinkering to do, which may be beyond your geek pay grade to accomplish. It is far wiser to order a pair of drives as a single upgrade kit, pre-imaged for plug-and-play installation. A pair of 500GB drives, for example, yields a whopping 360 hours at Best Quality, while a pair of top of the line 750GB drives gives so much space that your TiVo can't even display the number! The only downside is the increased noise level of the second drive in your living room. That was a deal breaker for me as I can't stand the thought of spending a day in front of a noisy computer, then relaxing in a room almost as noisy that evening. Then again, I didn't actually try this out so I don't really know how loud it would be. Just think about this before you decide how big to go.</font></p></p>

<p><a href="http://www.weaknees.com">Weaknees.com</a><br />
<br /><br />
<a href="http://www.dvrupgrade.com/">DVRUpgrade.com</a><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/tivo/harmonyone.jpg" align="right" hspace="4"><br />
<p><font size="3" face="Trebuchet MS"><b>Remote Possibility: Logitech Harmony One</b></font><br />
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Another item that is probably due for replacement or upgrade is your TiVo's tired old remote control. In my case, the Sony part is no longer offered even as a refurb; seems the lead level in the paint is too high in those old remotes to resell. Our beat-up old remote is held together with duct tape and the silkscreening is worn off the main buttons, so I contacted Logitech, the leader in programmable universal remotes, about a TiVo-compatible upgrade.</p></p>

<p>Logitech offers an array of attractive universal remote controls with some serious tech under their hoods. I selected their latest product, the HarmonyOne remote ($249). Now that may seem like a fair bit of cash for a universal remote, but this one is so much better than anything else out there that you won't mind. </p>

<p>The remote control hassle has become a real nightmare. When I am visiting a friend's house, I <i>never</i> touch their remote controls as a rule. Every one of them is different and so many things can go horribly wrong that I just don't do it. At my house, we have FIVE remotes for our home system, three of which are in constant use; it's absurd and frustrating. I'd love to just toss them all in a drawer and just use the front panel controls on all the devices, but these days many features are accessible only through the remote so you're stuck with the little plastic torture devices.</p>

<p>I've purchased and reviewed countless universal remotes over the years and none have been very good. There is always one critical function that they won't do, or one device's codes they can't replicate, or they turn things on in the wrong order, or need to be pointed <i>just so</i> or they won't work, or the damn batteries fall out and you need to completely reprogram it to do anything at all -- this is way more trouble than it is worth.</p>

<p>I am extremely pleased to report that Logitech has gotten it right with the Harmony One. It's absolutely brilliant. Slim and comfortable, it has a bright color touchscreen for major functions, or Activities as they call them: Watch TiVo, Watch a DVD, Listen to Radio, and so on. While touchscreen interfaces on remotes is nothing new, the level of sophistication on the Harmony One is light-years beyond anything else on the market. It even has an intelligent Help system that actually <i>helps you solve problems</i> and doesn't just send you back to the manual.</p>

<p>Out of the box, you drop the unit into its sleek black charging cradle to top up the replaceable lithium-ion battery inside. While it charges up, go over to your components and write down the make and model numbers of each device in your rig. Install the Logitech software in your Mac or Windows computer, then follow the prompts to enter this information into your new account at Logitech. By then your remote is probably sufficiently charged, so plug it into the supplied USB cable and let it update itself with the latest firmware if it needs to. The software then steps you through setting up your Activities, suggesting the most likely things you do with the devices you've specified. It works amazingly well. It knew that I want my TiVo on all the time and that I needed my first Activity to be "Watch PVR", which I renamed "Watch TiVo". It asked a couple of questions and set it up to switch on the TV and the surround amplifier/receiver and to leave the TiVo on no matter what. It set the input and output so I could listen through the surround system. Perfect!</p>

<p>Same experience with my DVD/CD player and the radio receiver functions in my surround amp/receiver, as well as my old VCR and my LiteOn DVD recorder. You can set it so that components remain on or off, or switch on only the components need for that Activity. The key feature is the way it intelligently asks about inputs and outputs so you never have to fiddle the TV/VCR button ever again. Set it once and it's done. You can even set the power-on sequence if you need to. The software found all my components instantly but didn't know all the remote codes for my Sony TiVo remote, so it directed me to point the original remote to the Harmony One and teach a few codes to it. After two of them, it said it knew the rest and it worked perfectly from then on. Need a particular oddball function from one of your old remotes? The Harmony One can learn it, then let you map it to one of its buttons or touchscreen icons. Sweet.</p>

<p>The above may sound complex but it's not; the Logitech software makes it super easy. You can add new devices at any time, remove old ones, make changes to button layouts, customize the touchscreen buttons, add your own graphics, and more if you want to geek out. The controls are laid out in a completely sensible way, not in that crazy haphazard way most remotes are. You always have a backup of all your settings on your computer and on Logitech's servers. The family loves it and babysitters can now easily operate our system without confusion. Take all your old remotes and stick 'em in a drawer -- you won't be needing them. I can't say enough good things about the Harmony One.</font><br />
<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i>~David MacNeill</i></font></p><br />
<a href="http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/remotes/universal_remotes/">Logitech Universal Remotes</a><br />
<br /><br />
<br /></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>WaterField Cargo Messenger Bag</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2008/02/waterfield_carg.html" />
<modified>2008-02-28T22:45:16Z</modified>
<issued>2008-02-27T19:05:30Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2008:/mt/6.159</id>
<created>2008-02-27T19:05:30Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> I have become an accidental messenger bag collector. Yes, I do ride a single-speed urban assault bike and yes, messenger bags make perfect sense for short jaunts around town, but I think the real reason I prefer them is...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/waterfield/cargo.jpg" align="right" hspace="11"></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I have become an accidental messenger bag collector. Yes, I do ride a single-speed urban assault bike and yes, messenger bags make perfect sense for short jaunts around town, but I think the real reason I prefer them is because they are masculine. Any proper messenger bag gives you the ability to carry your stuff around without the metrosexual overtones of the dreaded man-bag.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Messengers also do yeoman duty as briefcase/attaché replacements. Even back when I was an executive type toiling in dreary corporate fortresses, I never got comfortable with the inflated self-importance suggested by a briefcase. I always got a kick out of slinging something informal and collegiate over my starched shirt, as if to say, "Yeah, I make six figures, live in a McMansion, and drive a Lexus but that's not who I really am inside."</font></p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/waterfield/timbuk2.jpg" align="right" hspace="11"></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">My first messenger bag was one I picked up at the launch of Wired Magazine in 1993. It was a black Timbuk2 Messenger with a big fluorescent pink Wired logo on it. It was just one big sack with no internal pockets of any kind. Took me a while to realize that you just throw whatever in there and let it adapt itself to the shape of your back. I was hooked. When I decided to stop carrying around a magazine billboard I picked up another Timbuk2 Messenger ($95), a large red-black-red one with an internal flap containing pockets for mobile phones and such. Still have it 15 years later and it looks as good as the day I bought it, even though I've beaten the crap out of the thing and never so much as wiped it down. When I need to haul a big load of anything that can spill, this is the bag I use. The rubbery interior coating is thick yet pliable, keeping the contents protected and quiet while also being waterproof both ways. If you favor your beer in bottles as I do, this may be the beach bag for you.</font></p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/waterfield/trager.jpg" align="right" hspace="11"></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Several other messenger-style bags have come my way over the years. I reviewed a Trager Courier Laptop ($167) that was lightweight and attractive but which I ultimately found to be a pain in the keister. With its matte-black interior and myriad undifferentiated pockets it was difficult to figure out where everything was in that bag. The wimpy nylon section dividers just sort of flopped around when I tried to put things in the pockets one-handed. Papers and magazines would get trashed in the thin document compartments. And the instant you set the thing down the whole rig would flop over to the ground due to the bag's minimal structural stiffness. Even though it measured 16" x 13" x 6" it could only hold a smallish laptop AND you had to buy a separate padded sleeve for it since the bag had no built-in padding for a computer. This bag would be okay for carrying a sandwich and a couple of books to class but that's about it. I see Trager now has a proper messenger bag line, so perhaps I'll give them another look -- assuming they'll speak to me after they read this.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Next came a promising messenger-ish bag from Incase. It was a structured, wedge-shaped affair that offered tons of useful space, great laptop protection, and really cool aesthetics but literally fell down in the daily usefulness department; it would not, under any circumstances, remain upright. The company no longer makes this model and that's probably a good thing.</font></p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/waterfield/tenba-olive.jpg" align="right" hspace="11"></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">My next victim was a Tenba Messenger PM-17c ($115), a serious bag made for photojournalists who don't want to look like photojournalists. This has become the bag against which I judge all others. It is extremely well organized, with pockets galore that work well in daily use. Paper compartments are well separated and just stiff enough to keep their contents in presentable shape. The interior is light grey so I can easily find things in dim light. It's built to take a beating with burly hardware, stout materials, taped seams, and a thick rubberized bottom. It is designed to be extremely comfortable in use. Thick pads along the bag's backside, grab handle, and shoulder pad make it effortless to schlep for hours. And it looks somewhat like a piece of military surplus, particularly in Olive Drab; no one will ever call a Tenba Messenger a man-bag. And somehow this 2.8-pound, 18" x 13" x 7" bag manages to look smaller than it actually is. You can fit a 17" laptop in the padded rear compartment but at a glance you'd probably never guess it could handle that. I toss my trusty old 12" PowerBook in vertically, with an accessory bag alongside carrying an AC adapter, a DC adapter, a mouse, a clip-on webcam, and all my cables. I've even used the Tenba for overnight trips. It swallows up a change of casual clothes and a shaving kit easily yet still manages to look more like a book satchel than a piece of luggage. Since it qualifies as a "personal item" instead of a roll-aboard I can usually take my electric guitar onto the plane instead of checking it.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">So into my contented, Tenba-toting life comes a lovely WaterField Cargo Medium ($199) and a pile of matching accessories. WaterField, AKA sfbags.com, has been making extremely well-regarded cases for many years, all designed and made in San Francisco where, as the company proudly proclaims, "Rent is high, labor expensive, and competition is intense." Which they follow with, "We wouldn't go anywhere else." You've got to love 'em.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The incredibly nice people their sent me their flagship Cargo messenger bag, medium size with black and yellow "Taxi Indium" accent flap and the paragliding harness buckle. They also offer this bag with an airplane seat buckle, but now that flying has lost all its charm for me, I'd rather not see that particular piece of chrome everyday, thank you very much.</font></p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/waterfield/mambocombo.jpg" align="right" hspace="7"></p>

<p><font size="3" face="Trebuchet MS"><b>First impressions:</b></font>

<p><font size="3" face="Trebuchet MS"><i>

<p>1. Wow, it's really pretty -- maybe too pretty for a man to carry anywhere outside San Francisco or NYC?</p>

<p>2. How can it be so light yet hold its shape so well?</p>

<p>3. The outside phone pocket is on the wrong side. Is the designer a leftie?</p>

<p>4. Okay, I see the big pockets, but where are all the little pockets?</p>

<p>5. There is no padding anywhere on this bag except the shoulder strap.</p>

<p></i></font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">At this point, I'm feeling like I might be looking at a beautifully executed designer's dream of what messenger bags look like in some alternate universe. Compared to the determined utility of my Tenba, the WaterField Cargo seems kinda puny and costs about twice as much. Yet WaterField bags have so many glowing reviews from journalists and breathless testimonials from customers that I decide I must be missing something here.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">That's when the light came on: <i>It's the accessories, stupid!</i> You can't evaluate this bag without taking into account the SleeveCase, the CableGuy and/or the GearPouch. Okay, I'm BSing you on the GearPouch thing since I don't actually have one to review. But if it's anywhere near as good as the three different-sized CableGuys I received, then I think we'll all be okay. (Note to self: Order a GearPouch!)</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The WaterField Cargo is not a bag, it's a <i>modular system.</i> That's why WaterField offers the "Mambo Combo:" a bag, a laptop sleeve, and an accessory organizer for one reduced price. You can custom order just what you need and still save $24 or so.</font></p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/waterfield/sleevecase.jpg" align="right" hspace="11"></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Let's start with the SleeveCase. Like the Trager bag, the Cargo lacks a padded laptop compartment so you'll have to order one along with your Cargo. I requested the horizontal SleeveCase for my MacBook ($39) and it fits like the proverbial glove, offering 6mm of neoprene protection from anything coming from the bottom or the side. The top is open, so I'll just have to hope the Cargo's thick ballistic nylon fends off anything falling from on high. (You can custom order a padded top flap for an additional $15 -- I wish I had done so.) The fit is so perfect that WaterField included a little strap loop at the bottom so you can pull the case off without having to use just your fingers to clamp the top of your computer. The SleeveCase works great as an around-the-house carrier for my machine and there is even a handy pocket on one side for small items, but there are no D-rings for a strap unless you custom order them for an additional $12, or $18 with a matching strap. The SleeveCase is a superbly designed thing, far better than any other minimalist laptop case I've used, including designs from Trager, Tom Bihn, Incase, and several others whose brands I've forgotten.</font></p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/waterfield/cableguy.jpg" align="right" hspace="11"></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">For items like AC adapters and cables, you'll want one or more CableGuy gear cases. These come in three sizes, all of which fit into one or another pocket in the Cargo. The Large model ($25) spans the width of the front zippered pocket and makes a workable shaving kit if you keep your liquids in ziplocks for safety. The Medium model ($22) holds all my laptop stuff, as described above in the Tenba paragraph. The Small model ($19) is a catch-all for foreign coins, receipts, small tools, guitar picks, and so on. None of them are padded, but the edges are sewn in such a way that they provide a good deal of protection from bumps and the lack of padding keeps the whole rig slim and easy to manage in tight quarters.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">And that is really the main difference between the WaterField Cargo and the Tenba Messenger. Packed for a hypothetical trip with identical gear, the Tenba is shorter but thicker -- it can serve as a pillow if you're desperate. Even completely empty it's a little pudgy. The WaterField is inches slimmer and easier to navigate with in crowded spaces but not as comfortable to carry long distances. Your priorities and travel style will decide for you.</font></p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/waterfield/cargo-inside-face.jpg" align="right" hspace="11"></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Then there is the gadget pocket issue. It seems like a trivial thing but in daily use, it's kind of a big deal. No bag designer can know exactly what you will be stuffing in your bag, so you either get lots of smaller, different sized pockets or fewer large ones. The WaterField leans toward the larger size, with two paperback book-sized deep pockets under the front zipper flap, the underside of which is graced with a shallower wide pocket. In the rear compartment where your laptop and/or clothes live, there is a row of three pockets, a slimmer one that's roughly iPod/iPhone size, and an ID/biz card pocket. You also have an external phone-size pocket on right side of the bag but you may not like it there. Since I spend so much time with a heavy guitar hanging from my left shoulder, I always sling my bag strap over my right shoulder to keep my back in balance. Worn thus, my phone would be behind me on my right in a blind spot that thieves will not fail to notice. Park my $400 iPhone there? I think not. I use that pocket for pens, mints, cheap sunglasses, combs, and other items of negligible value.</font></p>

<p><img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/waterfield/indy-sitting.jpg" align="right" hspace="11"></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">And now we tackle the prettiness issue. Laugh all you want, metro-boy -- I live in Idaho where things like this matter to a bloke. I suggest ordering your Cargo in black if you feel self-conscious wearing all that splashy color. On a bike, of course, the bright colors are a good thing, which is why I went for the screaming yellow Taxi Indium on mine. The usual rules of male coolness are somewhat less strict when cycling -- where else can a dude wear spandex and not elicit chuckles from the punters? At the cafe, however, it's a different story. Look at this photo of Indiana Jones with his battered canvas bag. Now imagine that bag festooned with a cheerful yellow checkerboard pattern -- 'nuff said.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Verdict? I am retiring the Tenba and going with the WaterField. The case-within-a-case modularity fits my travel style better than the Tenba's generic approach. And the slimness of the Cargo may even make my crazy life run just a little smoother. When I'm overseas on tour for several months at a stretch, I live out of my luggage in a way the average daily commuter never will. Last summer I went nine straight weeks living out of a messenger bag, a small duffle bag, and a guitar case. Everything has to work in perfect harmony, from insane airport security lines to dinky rental cars to ale-soaked greenrooms to closet-size quarters in back of the pub. And sometimes you have to be able to instantly grab everything you own and run like hell. Weight, bulk, reliability, and organization become hugely important on the road. I feel confident my WaterField gear will do just fine.<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i>~David MacNeill</i></font></p>
<br />
<a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/cargo/cargo.htm">WaterField Cargo at sfbags.com</a>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>What&apos;s wrong with the iPhone</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2008/01/whats_wrong_wit.html" />
<modified>2008-01-29T21:48:56Z</modified>
<issued>2008-01-22T21:24:49Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2008:/mt/6.143</id>
<created>2008-01-22T21:24:49Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I&apos;ve just spent a month with a loaned iPhone and have a few thoughts to share. My friend Conrad has written several thousand words on the iPhone elsewhere on this site, so I won&apos;t duplicate his excellent work. And I...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[I've just spent a month with a loaned iPhone and have a few thoughts to share. My friend Conrad has written several thousand words on the iPhone  <a href="http://pencomputing.com/iphone/"> elsewhere on this site,</a>  so I won't duplicate his excellent work. And I agree with his overall assessment: the iPhone is a wonderful device, skillfully combining a superb mobile phone, a slick web browser, superior email functionality, a powerful personal organizer, and an iPod media player. But as sweet as it is, the iPhone is not all it can be.
<br /><br />
Where I differ from comrade Conrad's assessment is in the text entry and editing department. The rest of the device is so beautifully crafted that we've all just blindly accepted the QWERTY tap-and-pray text entry it offers. It's a clunky, tedious, and error-prone method for entering anything more than a name and a phone number. I think Apple is so deathly afraid to include anything even remotely like handwriting recognition that they've crippled the iPhone. And to make matters worse, there is no cut and paste function. Come on Apple, this is <i>cut and paste</i> we're talking about, not immersive telepresence. How hard can it be for your army of brilliant software engineers to code that?
<br /><br />
And one more thing: the lack of Flash compatibility in the browser is more than annoying, it's almost a deal breaker for me. I don't care about watching videos or playing games, I need the ability to edit Google Docs and use other "Web 2.0" functions. Without Flash, the iPhone is not really a handheld computer at all, but a mere data viewer with a lovely touch interface. Nothing wrong with that -- most folks seems satisfied using their iPhones this way. But I'm an <i>editor</i>, and I need my tools to allow me to <i>edit things</i>.
<br /><br />
Don't get the idea that I'm handing in my enthusiasm along with my loaned iPhone this week. On the contrary, I'm buying my own iPhone to replace the loaner as soon as I can. I've grown completely attached to the thing and can't stomach the thought of having to go back to my primitive Motorola RAZR - <i>yuk</i>. I'm an iPhone man now and nothing will change that, but it frustrates me that Apple is hobbling this otherwise fantastic device for...what? Marketing paranoia because of what happened with the Newton MessagePad a decade ago? Petty political jostling with Adobe over Flash? Fears over iPhone cannibalizing MacBook sales if they make it too useful? Are they afraid they'll confuse us if they include too many powerful features? 
<br /><br />
We'll eventually find out, of course. Until then, count me among the iPhone fanboys not so much for what it is today, but because of its potential. ~David MacNeill]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Casio Pathfinder PAW 1300T7</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2007/12/casio_pathfinde.html" />
<modified>2007-12-31T03:43:42Z</modified>
<issued>2007-12-30T19:05:27Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2007:/mt/6.137</id>
<created>2007-12-30T19:05:27Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> Used to be if you wanted a rugged watch for hiking or diving, you paid a lot of money for it. Now the Rolex Explorers, Omega Speedmasters, and Tag Heuer Aquaracers mostly hang from the wrists of folks who...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/Casio-Pathfinder-PAW-1300T7.jpg" align="right" hspace="1">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Used to be if you wanted a rugged watch for hiking or diving, you paid a lot of money for it. Now the Rolex Explorers, Omega Speedmasters, and Tag Heuer Aquaracers mostly hang from the wrists of folks who want to look outdoorsy but  would never expose their shiny timepieces to the elements. Nothing wrong with that, it's just the way some products go upmarket over time. And it makes sense in a world where you can buy attractive, durable, and supremely functional digital watches for less than what it costs to get a mechanical Swiss watch cleaned and tuned by your friendly neighborhood horologist.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Casio has been in the outdoor digital watch space for decades. Their watches have been to the ends of the Earth, had the crap knocked out of them, and still did their job. The company's terrestrial line is called Pathfinder and they are probably the most fully featured wrist-worn instruments you can buy.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I tested the top-shelf Pathfinder PAW-1300T-7V with the titanium bracelet. This year's Pathfinders are much thinner and more comfortable than previous models in the line, yet none of their legendary features or durability have been sacrificed. The watch runs on a rechargeable battery that is constantly topped up by a solar cell. Even in total darkness, it'll stay accurate for many months on a charge. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Far more than a watch <font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>This watch is really far more than a watch. It has a receiver for the time signals transmitted over most of the world from atomic clock installations such as the one in Fort Collins, Colorado that serves the continental US. Four times a day, it checks the signal and adjust as necessary so you always have the exact time. So called &quot;atomic&quot; watches are the most accurate portable timepieces you can buy. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Now that you know the exact time, how about the direction you are traveling, the altitude, the temperature, and a weather forecast? This Pathfinder has a digital compass, an altimeter, a thermometer, and a barometer. The compass can be easily adjusted for magnetic declination, bidirectional calibration, and northerly calibration for absolute accuracy. You can even set a bearing to guide your way through the wilderness.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The altimeter does a remarkably good job using air pressure and temperature to give a reading. It can measure your ascent/descent over time, displaying the data in a graph. You can see the highest and lowest you've been over a period of time and set an altitude differential. A variety of display options make this feature easy to love.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Perhaps the most useful of the non-timekeeping features is the barometer/thermometer mode. The sensors work in tandem to not only give you a reading of current conditions but also tracks the data constantly no matter what foreground mode the watch is in. You can quickly check a graph from the main time display that shows the weather trend over the recent past. If the line is heading down fast, sailors take warning. If it's headed up, put away your rain gear and slap on some sunscreen. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">And, of course, this remarkable device does more: world time, countdown timer, stopwatch, and alarms. It is waterproof to 100 meters -- not water resistant, waterproof as in fall-out-of-the-boat-into-the-lake. It has an electroluminescent display that can be activated with a tap of a button or set to automatically come on for two seconds when you flip your wrist to see the watch face. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Perpetual motion machine (almost) <font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>Considering that this instrument runs on solar power for years and does so much, it's practically a perpetual motion machine. You can get this watch with a resin, canvas, or titanium band so prices range from $300 to $350. I recommend getting the titanium band, as it will not only last forever but looks as good as any multi-thousand dollar Swiss sport watch and works better than any metal band I've ever used. I once had to return a $2000 Breitling Aerospace three times in two years to have the titanium band repaired under warranty. I got so tired of this that after the last repair, I sold the watch and gave up on Breitling forever. The Casio bracelet design feels better, locks more securely, and the workmanship is flawless.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">This Casio Pathfinder takes almost nothing from me yet gives back more than any other sport watch I've ever used. </font></p>
<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i>~David MacNeill</i></font></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>iPod Sound Systems</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2007/12/ipod_sound_syst.html" />
<modified>2009-03-13T17:21:51Z</modified>
<issued>2007-12-17T02:03:48Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2007:/mt/6.105</id>
<created>2007-12-17T02:03:48Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> There are dozens of iPod-compatible sound systems on the market. You can&apos;t swing a cat in a consumer electronics store without knocking over stacks of them. We&apos;ve rounded up over 20 of the best, put them all on the...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/purefi-anywhere_redwall.jpg" align="right" hspace="11">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">There are dozens of iPod-compatible sound systems on the market. You can't swing a cat in a consumer electronics store without knocking over stacks of them. We've rounded up over 20 of the best, put them all on the bench and let 'em rip. What follows is our short list of the best in each category, with ties given where we couldn't pick a clear favorite. Some models sound so similar that the only way to choose is because of a unique feature or a cool design aspect. Price did not factor into the equation, since in virtually all cases the prices are so close as to be irrelevant. </font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I can only imagine how many times Apple designers tried to fit little speakers to the iPod, only to have their designs end up in the trash. The iPod is so perfect as it is that bulky speakers just have to be a separate item. Recalling the Great Boombox Plague of the 1980s, perhaps Steve Jobs simply doesn't care to be exposed other people's musical tastes -- unless they are buying that music from the iTunes Store so all he hears is the sweet <i>ka-ching!</i> of profit. <i>De gustibus</i> may be <i>non disputantum</i> but everybody likes to get paid.</font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Of course, Apple does offer one iPod sound system, the  $349 <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodhifi">Apple Hi-Fi</a>. Requests to Apple for a loaner to review have yielded no response, so the Hi-Fi is not included in this roundup. The Hi-Fi began quietly disappearing from retail racks a couple of months ago and it is no longer available at Apple's online store, so they are either working on an updated model (likely, since the Hi-Fi product page is still up on Apple's website) or leaving the iPod sound system business for other companies to exploit.</font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/hk-go&play.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Best All-Purpose iPod Sound System: Harman Kardon Go+Play ($349)<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>This amazing machine really crosses categories. It's certainly portable, weighing in at under 5 pounds with batteries. Yet it sounds better than any other sound system made strictly for AC-powered desktop use. The Go+Play uses the exact components Harman Kardon made for the Mercedes S-class. Its sound is unlike anything else any other unit is capable of emitting. The high end is airy and crystal clear, while the dual subwoofers pump out so much clean, thumping bass you'll have the neighbors complaining. Between the extremes there lies the all-important mids, and HK made them pour out exactly right. I compared the Go+Play to my Audioengine A5 desktop monitors ($349 street) and it was basically a wash. The A5s were flatter (meaning more accurate compared to the source material) and the stereo "soundstage"  was wider since they were farther apart. But in detail, volume, and sheer spine-tingling power, the Go+Play held its own. If I was going to play my music in some music exec's office, I'd drop the Go+Play on his desk and let it blow his ponytail back. </font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">This Go+Play is not without controversy. Other reviewers have whined about the lack of equalization controls and the horizontal dock bed. Yep, your $350 sound system has no bass or treble controls -- nor does it need them. Harman Kardon designed in the hi-res digital logic to make all necessary adjustments for you. To my ears, they got it absolutely right. I could not find a volume level that needed any EQ to make it better. Technically, you could employ your iPod's internal equalizer presets to bend it as you please, but I see no need. The flat dock is only a problem if you want to use the remote to pick songs from you iPod screen when you are across the room. From that far away, you wouldn't be able to read it anyway. I don't think this is a deal breaker, but you might.  I think having the iPod display visible from the front of the machine would detract from the ultra-minimalist aesthetic of the thing. Speaking of the remote, it uses RF (radio frequency) instead of IR (infrared) so you don't have to aim it to use it. You also get greater range. There is even a pop-out drawer for it hidden in the back of the Go+Play. </font></p>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Obviously, I could rattle on and on about this remarkable machine, so I'll just leave you with this single sentence description: 120-watts cleanly powering four world-class speakers built into a portable, black and silver work of art that consistently lets your iPod's music sound absolutely wonderful at any volume, indoors or out. <br /><a href="http://www.harmankardon.com/">Harman Kardon</a></font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/audioengine-a2w.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Best Stationary iPod Sound System: Audioengine A2 Powered Speakers ($199)<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>Okay, so I bent the rules a little. The Audioengine A2 doesn't have an iPod dock unless you plop one on top. But the left speaker does have the connections to make this work with the iPod dock you already own. The company doesn't market the A2 as an iPod-specific sound system, but it works beautifully that way. At one-third the size of the $349 Audioengine A5, these compact speakers still sound so full you'll be looking around for a secret subwoofer under the desk. Silk tweeters, kevlar woofers, dual class A/B 30-watt amplifier, beautifully finished cabinets in black or white, and all the gold-tipped cables you'll need for connect anything to them. </font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/audioengine-a5w.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">If you're up for spending $150 more, get the Audioengine A5 ($349) instead. More lows, more power, more everything. Buying the A5s makes sense if you want to fill a living room with sound and you don't plan to move them around much. I've used a pair for almost a year now for all my everyday listening and as second monitors for my Pro Tools recording, mixing, and mastering work. They sit atop a pair of $1000 Mackie HR824 studio monitors I use for my critical work. The A5s sound near as good unless I have to crank up the volume to paint-peeling, rafter-rattling levels. These are magnificent sounding, great-looking powered studio monitors pretending to be mere powered speakers. I don't think you will find better sound for the price and you definitely won't find anything better looking. <br /><a href="http://www.audioengineusa.com/">Audioengine USA</a></font></p>

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/purefi-anywhere.jpg" align="left" hspace="4">

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/im600.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Best Mobile iPod Sound System: Logitech Pure-Fi Anywhere ($149) and Altec Lansing iM600 ($149)<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>This was a tough call. Two identically priced units from two great companies in fierce competition. There are plenty of things about the two products that will sway you one way or the other, but either way you win. They both offer brilliant sound quality from compact designs that were built to last. They are more alike than they are different. The Logitech is wide where the Altec is more squarish but both pack small and flat. The Logitech has an AC adapter that fits in the iPod well for easy travel, while the Altec has a very good FM radio. Both have internal rechargeable batteries, the Logitech rated at 10 hours and the Altec rated at 7. Both offer stereo field expander logic to trick your ears into thinking the speakers are farther apart, though at the risk of a slight increase in distortion at max volume. Both have auxiliary input jacks for non-iPod audio sources and both have excellent remote controls. Both have comparable output power and maximum volume before distortion spoils the party. The Logitech has a sweet fitted travel case, while the Altec has an alarm clock feature. If you haven't already decided which one you want more at this point, then perhaps you don't need a mobile sound system after all. <br /><a href="http://www.logitech.com/">Logitech</a><br /><a href="http://www.alteclansing.com/">Altec Lansing</a></font></p>

<br /><p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">
 If you're looking for sound quality and affordability in an iPod docking station, these <a href="http://www.thespeakercompany.com/iPod-Speakers-C29.aspx">cheap iPod speakers</a> could be the solution that sounds good and isn't too expensive.</p>
<br /></font>

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>HONORABLE MENTIONS<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>Want to spend a little less and still get good sound, useful features, and solid build quality? Consider the following products as safe choices in this increasingly crowded market niche: <br />

<br />

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/tunepro.jpg" align="left" hspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Macally TunePro ($99)<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>We were impressed with the TunePro for its pleasant combination of superior good looks, small footprint, cool embedded clock display, excellent radio, and clear sound from its flat panel speakers. If you need an iPod-compatible clock radio on your bedside table and don't plan to blast it loud enough to wake the whole house, the TunePro is a great choice. <br /><a href="http://www.macally.com/">Macally</a></font></p>

<br />

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/journi.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">

<br />

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Griffin Technologies Journi ($130)<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>The Journi was hot on the heels of both the Pure-Fi Anywhere and the iM600 for top billing. It has a comparable feature set, stereo field expander logic, aux input, rechargeable battery, remote control, and a brilliant design including an integrated case that folds into a stand. In fact the only area that fell from "excellent" to "good" was the sound quality when cranked way up high. If you never listen really loud, then you could save yourself $20 and go with the Journi. You've got to love that black faux-leather case/stand! <br /><a href="http://www.griffintechnology.com/">Griffin Technology</a></font></p>

<br />

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/im9-bag.jpg" align="left" hspace="4">

<br />

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Altec Lansing iM9 ($199, heavily discounted online)<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>If your travels take you places where your gear tends to get roughed up a bit, you should consider the Altec Lansing iM9 . It offers much of what makes the Pure-Fi Anywhere and the iM600 attractive, but it's wrapped up in a semi-rugged shell. Bass output is remarkably good for its size, though the trebles are not quite as sweet as others in this range. It uses alkaline C-size batteries instead of a built-in rechargeable pack and it is about two pounds heavier, but it comes with a really nice backpack-style case for taking your music where no one has gone before. <br /><a href="http://www.alteclansing.com/">Altec Lansing</a></font></p>

<br />
<br />
<br />

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/ihome-ih82.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">

<br />

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>iHome iH82 Powered Speakers ($129)<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>If you want a stationary bookshelf-style stereo in a bedroom, kitchen, or dorm room but can't pony up for the Audioengines, consider the iHome iH82. This is a pair of powered speakers, one of which has a built-in iPod dock. Sound quality is nothing to write home about but is certainly adequate for casual listening. These would be great for an iPod-toting teen. The list price of $129 is too high for what you get. If this set listed for $99 they'd be a lot easier to recommend -- look for discounts online. <br /><a href="http://ihomeaudio.com/">iHome Audio</a></font></p>

<br />

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/ipodsoundsystems/dlo-iboom-travel.jpg" align="left" hspace="4">

<br />

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>DLO iBoom Travel ($89)<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>Though there isn't much of what you'd call <i>boom</i> in the iBoom Travel, there is plenty of travel potential due to it's diminutive proportions. This is the smallest iPod clock radio we've seen and it does all the things you'd expect it to and does them well. Just don't expect the little guy to blow your socks off. <br /><a href="http://www.dlo.com/">DLO</a></font></p>
<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i>~David MacNeill</i></font></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>World&apos;s  Best Headphones for iPod</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2007/12/worlds_best_hea.html" />
<modified>2009-03-13T17:24:55Z</modified>
<issued>2007-12-13T21:48:32Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2007:/mt/6.104</id>
<created>2007-12-13T21:48:32Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">The people who create the music you love don&apos;t hear their work the way you do. They all use speakers and headphones made for professionals -- pricey, ultra-reliable, serious tools you&apos;ll rarely see on any store shelf. Think Sting walks...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The people who create the music you love don't hear their work the way you do. They all use speakers and headphones made for professionals -- pricey, ultra-reliable, serious tools you'll rarely see on any store shelf. Think Sting walks along his private beach in Tahiti with common iPod ear buds on? Can you imagine Springsteen sitting on a plane wearing those throwaway earphones the sky waitress hands out with the peanuts?</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">It's not about status or wealth or fashion, it's about <em>fidelity</em>. When your life's work is made of sound waves, you need to hear the truth and you need to protect your hearing. Truly great headphones provide both, and they're not as crazy-expensive as you might expect. If you love music, read on and learn how to hear like you've never heard before.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Fair warning:</strong> You may be perfectly happy with the quality of your iTunes library  the way it is. After listening to a few tracks on the world's best headphones, I guarantee that you will want to re-rip every one of your CDs and upgrade any songs you have purchased from the iTunes Store to iTunes Plus. Generally speaking, anything rendered at lower than 192 kbps, in MP3 or AAC format, will sound somewhat shabby on pro-grade headphones. However, once you've upgraded your library to 256 kbps, you will enjoy subtleties in your  music you never imagined -- and you'll find yourself listening at lower volume levels too. </font></p>
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/headphones/headroom-total-airhead2.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">
<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=3>Impedance and sensitivity</font><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2></font></strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><br />
  You might think you can simply jack your studio-grade headphones into your iPod and achieve sonic bliss, but it ain't necessarily so. Most top-shelf headphones are designed to work best with hot amps and mixers that put out a lot more clean power than an iPod, laptop, smartphone, or portable CD player emits. There are compact, battery-powered headphone pre-amps that take care of the mismatch nicely, making any headphone sound as good as it possibly can. We like and recommend the <a href="http://www.headphone.com/products/headphone-amps/the-mobile-line/headroom-total-airhead.php">Total AirHead ($99)</a> but there are other mobile pre-amps out there. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">How can you tell if a headphone will mate well with your mobile audio device and not need a pre-amp? Two terms to know: <em>impedance</em> and <em>sensitivity</em>. Without geeking out on you, I'll say that all you need to know is that the impedance should be low and the sensitivity should be high. Some manufacturers omit sensitivity ratings from their product descriptions, so often all you'll have to go on is impedance. Generally speaking, you want your impedance to be under 75 ohms. There are some exceptions but that's a good rule to work with.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The rub of low-impedance &quot;cans&quot; is that they aren't the absolute best sounding headphones in the universe. Great headphones need a lot of power and that usually means the impedance is high. Don't get me wrong -- there are some fantastic-sounding low impedance models out there that most people will swoon over. But the very best have impedances in the 200-300 ohm range. This makes testing and choosing them difficult, as there is a trade-off between mobility and performance. There are high-impedance headphones that are so sweetly good we simply had to include them, with the caveat that they need a preamp, adding $99 to the price.</font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=3>Around the ear, on the ear, and in the ear</font><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2></font></strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><br />
There are essentially three types of headphones: The classic big ones that go around your ear and rest against your head are called <em>circumaural</em>. These are the classic old-school cans you see recording artists wear in the studio. They come in two styles, <em>closed-back</em> and <em>open-back</em>. Closed-back designs provide isolation from the outside world and do not bleed sound out to your surroundings. The obvious benefits are that you hear only your music and no one else hears it. Recording artists always use closed-backs so they can hear the track they are playing or singing to but the ultra-sensitive studio microphone <i>doesn't</i> hear it. Open-back designs have a more natural sound; they are in essence a pair of small monitor speakers hanging in the air in front of your ears. With few exceptions, audiophile-quality headphones are open-back. They bleed all over the place and they block almost no sound from the outside world from mixing with your music, but they sound spine-tinglingly glorious. If you listen alone in quiet places, get open-back headphones. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Another common design you'll find are designed to sit directly on top of your ears. Called <em>supraaural</em>, these cans block a little more from the outside and bleed a little less than open-back circumaural designs. We did not include any supraaural models in this round-up for three reasons: (a) Grado, the top maker of this kind of headphone, chose not to participate -- which is no big deal because (b) I think they look funny and (c) in over three decades of hanging around in recording studios I've <i>never</i> seen anyone wear them.</font>    </p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">In the last five years or so there has been a huge amount of interest in a style of headphone that was developed for discreet stage monitoring. They are variously called <em>in-ear</em> or <em>canalphones</em> but they are are the same thing. These are tiny little plugs that insert directly into your ear canal, like a hearing aid. Properly fitted, they virtually disappear. The very best sounding designs use multiple tiny speakers (also called <em>drivers</em> in pro audio lingo) to separate the highs from the lows for better fidelity. They are always low impedance and have high enough sensitivity for direct connection to iPods and other low-ouput devices.</font></p>
<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2>In-earphones are not for everyone. They take a while to get used to and can be a bit fiddly to fit correctly. They are also harder to live with since you have to carefully insert them rather than just pop them on your head like big cans. When you take them off, you don't want to just throw them in your pocket. They are  delicate little mechanisms and should not be exposed to hard knocks and dirt -- and you don't want to stick a dirty object directly into your skull everyday. You need to be a bit fussy and keep them in their sealed case.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">But the rewards are worth it. In-earphones offer the best isolation of any kind of headphone, both internal and external. They are easy to take along because they are so impossibly small. You can listen privately in public without announcing to the world what you are doing. And best of all, the top models sound stunningly gorgeous.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The precursor of the in-earphone was the earbud, the design that comes with every iPod. Earbuds are small, handy, somewhat stealthy, and sound bloody awful. Muddy lows, missing mids, tinny highs -- no thanks. Life's too short to wear earbuds.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3">World's Best Headphones for iPod</font></strong><br />
I have  combined all headphone types into a single list. Choose the style that you think would best fit your lifestyle, then decide how much it is worth to you to actually <em>hear</em> all of the music you love. Sticker shock is normal in this range, but you only have to pay once for the best, versus buying mediocre things over and over again. There are some relative bargains to be found at the end of the list, but remember: It's about sound, glorious sound -- as much as you can get for what you can afford. </font></p>
<br />
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/headphones/akg-k701.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/headphones/sennheiser-hd650.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Best circumaural open-back headphone with a pre-amp: AKG K 701 and Sennheiser HD 650<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>We have a tie for best sounding headphones. The AKG K701 ($450 list, $310 street) and Sennheiser HD 650 ($500 list, $350 street) are both so exceedingly great that choosing between them comes down to which one fits your head better. To me, the Sennheiser fits a little snugger yet feels lighter than the AKG, but almost imperceptibly so. If you prefer a headphone you can wear for very long periods, then you may find the AKG a tad more comfy. People used to wearing tight-fitting studio cans will probably like the Sennheisers better. There are also the dramatically contrasting aesthetics to factor in. The AKG is an eye-catching design in white and grey like your iPod, with an auto-adjusting brown leather headband that is classy looking and supremely comfortable. The Sennheisers are dark grey and black, with an austere old-school look that audio pros will prefer. Whichever you choose, you can be secure in knowing that you are wearing the best headphones on the planet. Don't forget to factor in an extra C-note for a headphone pre-amp -- you'll need it when you want to take all that goodness outside. </font></p>
<br />
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/headphones/beyerdynamic-dt770.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Best circumaural closed-back headphone with a pre-amp: beyerdynamic DT 770<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>If you want stunningly accurate sound but need isolation, buy the beyerdynamic DT 770 ($319 list, $269 street). These sweet cans offer the sound of beyerdynamic's top open-back model (the brilliant DT 990) but with the benefit of keeping all that goodness to yourself while you shut off the world around you. My friend Lance Taber is a principal guitarist/producer behind the smash-hit <em>Guitar Hero</em> series of computer games, and he always does his final mixes wearing his beloved DT 770s. This is a man with golden ears who can have any headphone he desires -- need I say more? Yes: <em>Don't forget the pre-amp.</em></font></p>
<br />
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/headphones/beyerdynamic-dt860.jpg" align="left" hspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Best circumaural open-back without a pre-amp: beyerdynamic DT 860<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>Beyerdynamic doesn't make a big deal about it but they produce the best headphones you can buy that don't require a pre-amp. Perhaps they should be shouting it from the rooftops. With so many millions of iPods piping perfectly sweet music into crappy $5 earbuds, there is clearly a market for upgrades. Our favorite in the unpre-amped category is the DT 860 ($319 list, $269 street). It offers superb sound, clean aesthetics, durable design, and folding ear cups for easy packing. Just plug them into your iPod and hurl those little white earbuds into the dumpster where they belong.</font></p>
<br />
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/headphones/akg-k271.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Best circumaural closed-back without a pre-amp: AKG K 271<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>Go into any pro recording studio and you'll find  the AKG K 271 ($270 list, $190 street). Dead accurate, incredibly durable, extremely comfortable, and reasonably priced. They offer excellent isolation for recording use, or just to keep street noise out of your Beethoven string quartets. They also mute themselves when you take them off -- how cool is that? Chances are good that many of your favorite songs were recorded by musicians wearing these cans. They have a removable locking cable since it's the cable that wears out first in constant professional use. It also makes them easier to pack and store. They drive well jacked directly into iPods. What's not to love?</font></p>
<br />
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/headphones/shure-se530.jpg" align="left" hspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Best in-earphone: Shure SE530<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>Want to make the world go away and drift into a perfect world of sound so powerful it makes the hairs on your arms stand up? Pony up for a set of Shure SE530 ($499 list, $359 street) in-earphones. Shure pioneered the in-ear monitor for musicians to wear on stage, so they've always delivered units that offer not only professional-grade sound but that are absolutely reliable -- every gig, tour after tour. When musicians started taking their in-ears with them to the tour bus after the performance, it became clear there was a market for in-earphones beyond the stage. Now there are several companies offering in-earphones but we think Shure has the edge. The SE530 uses three discrete micro-drivers: one for the highs and two for the low frequencies. The result is balanced, audiophile-grade performance unlike anything that has come before. It comes with a fit kit to make it easy to find that balance of comfort, performance, and isolation. Forget the noise-cancelling headphones you see from Bose, Sony, and others. If you want to really get away from it all and hear your music exactly the way it was recorded, you want Shure SE530s.</font></p>
<br />
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/headphones/ultimate-ears-superfi5pro1.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">

<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Best bargain in-earphone: Ultimate Ears super.Fi 5 Pro<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>While two hundred bucks is not what most people would call a bargain for a pair of earphones, true music lovers on a budget will be glad to pay it to get what they need. If you can't shell out five bills for the glorious triple-driver Shure SE530 in-ears, get Ultimate Ears super.Fi 5 Pro ($249 list, $189 street) in white, black, or clear (our favorite.) They offer the best performance you'll find in dual-driver in-earphones, with a smoothness that makes you want to listen for hours. They are easy to fit compared to most of their competition and the clear model with the cords wrapped over your ears and behind your neck make them essentially disappear, Secret Service agent-style. They don't insert quite as far as other models in this range, making them great for those who are new to in-earphones. These are remarkably sweet little cans for the money.</font></p>
<br />
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/headphones/sennheiser-hd280pro.jpg" align="left" hspace="4">

<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/headphones/audio-technica-atha700.jpg" align="left" hspace="4">
<br />
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS"><strong>Best bargain circumaural without a pre-amp: Sennheiser HD280 Pro and Audio-Technica ATH-A700<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3"><br />
</font></strong>Another tie, ladies and gentleman. The Sennheiser HD280 Pro ($199 list, $99 street) is a staple among recording musicians who need to spend their money on reference monitors rather than headphones. They are unbeatable for the $99 discounted price and can be easily driven directly by an iPod. They are reasonably comfortable and seal very well. If you need great sound and isolation on the cheap, get the HD280s. If you needs lean more toward listening than creating music -- and that music tends to be bass heavy -- then you'll find satisfaction in Audio-Technica's ATH-A700 closed backs ($299 list, $119 street). These attractive, oversize yet  plushly comfortable cans offer specs and features usually associated with models costing twice as much and for the most part they deliver what the marketing language promises. To my ears, they sound a bit boomy in the bass which overrides the rest of the frequencies to an extent. You may like this hugeness, however. And you can always dial back the bass on your amp or iPod if it gets to be too much of a good thing. Still, a good value at $119.</font></p>

<p> <font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Headphones don't have to cost a fortune to be good. These <a href="http://www.thespeakercompany.com/Headphones-C26.aspx">discount stereo headphones</a> offer stylish design, an emphasis on sound quality, and won't set you back hundreds of dollars.</p>

<p><font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i>~David MacNeill</i></font></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>SeV Explorer Jacket</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2007/12/sev_explorer_ja.html" />
<modified>2007-12-17T23:35:53Z</modified>
<issued>2007-12-11T21:33:42Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2007:/mt/6.103</id>
<created>2007-12-11T21:33:42Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">A coat, even one that is perfectly suited to a life entwined with personal tech, is still a coat. In the middle of the night, scrambling into something warm so you can drive your sick kid to the ER, it&apos;s...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">A coat, even one that is perfectly suited to a life entwined with personal tech, is still a coat. In the middle of the night, scrambling into something warm so you can drive your sick kid to the ER, it's just a coat and it had better do its job. Wallet, keys, mobile phone, grab the kid and you're out the door. This is no time to think about your iPod's earbud wires, okay? The SeV Explorer Jacket is a superb coat that'll keep you warm, make you look good, and let you brilliantly organize all your daily gear and effects within.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I've reviewed virtually every SeV product since before the company was launched. I think the only bits I've missed are the tie (because I'll never wear a tie) and the Ultimate Cargo Shorts (because cargo pants make me look fat). While I have ended up wearing a number of SeV garments long after the review was past, it was always the simpler, less obvious items that stayed in regular rotation. Jackets with a dozen visible pockets are not cool unless you are a professional cameraman -- and they make me look fat.</font></p>
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/SeVExplorerJacket.jpg" align="left" hspace="6">
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">When I saw the new SeV catalog featuring the brown Explorer Jacket ($200 direct), I dropped their president Scott Jordan an email of congratulation. Here was an attractive cold weather long coat with classic lines that just happened to have 20 pockets invisibly arrayed inside. No backpack pocket, no car racing suit-style collar, and no overt logos. It even has big old-school buttons along with the main zipper down the front -- nice and casual. It still has crisp SeV lines, only the edge has been softened a bit. The handy gusseted breast pockets have buttons but they are just to complete the look; these pockets close with velcro tabs.</font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3">Fewer pockets, better pockets </font></strong><br />
    <font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I have used almost every pocket in this coat, a claim I cannot make about all previous SeV coats. Though the Explorer has fewer than most, they are placed better for the way I live. It's easy to pat myself down to find things once I get home and want to unload. Phone, wallet, keys, iPod, sunglasses, notepad and pen -- all right where I expect them to be. If I'm out with the family, add my compact camera, a paperback or magazine, and occasionally a flask. There is an appropriate pocket to hold all these things securely, yet you don't see or feel any bulges. Sure, stuff a fat hardback or a 16-ounce water bottle in there and you're going to notice, so if it bugs you, don't do that.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I liked the Explorer immediately and like it even more now that I've been all over town wearing it for a few weeks. It's cold here in Boise this time of year, so I often wear a thick wool sweater under my coat if I'm going to be outside for a while. The Explorer is cut generously enough to be comfortable even when heavily layered. The Teflon-treated &quot;microsuede&quot; fabric and quilted lining are light and flexible yet warm and resistant to both wind and moderate rain or snow. I have no complaints about fabrics, fit, or finish. It's all top notch and as good or better than casual outerwear from other makers.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">I have but one minor complaint, and it is one that is an easy fix. The left inside eyewear pocket contains a shock cord with a metal alligator clip that is holding a square of microfiber for polishing lenses. Metal hardware in a pocket meant for glasses? Your hundred-dollar Ray-Bans will not appreciate that roach clip hanging around, so cut off the clip and the rough cord and let the microfiber dwell in the bottom of the pocket. If you lose it someday, so what? Cleaning cloths are infinitely cheaper than replacing scratched lenses.</font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3">Man purse? Think again. </font></strong><br />
<font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">SeV's latest designs show a sensitivity to the needs of people who do not want to dress like alpha-geeks. Many men carry two or three gadgets, a wallet and keys around all day. An SeV Tactical Jacket's 35 pockets are completely unnecessary and can be downright confusing for regular guys. But when regular guys get an iPod, a pocket satnav, and a digicam for Christmas and find themselves suddenly having visions of the dreaded man-purse, an Explorer Jacket starts to make a lot of sense. Save your what's left of your masculine pride and join the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browncoat"> browncoats</a>! <br /><a href="http://scottevest.com/v3_store/Explorer_Jacket.shtml">SeV Explorer Jacket</a> </font><br />
<font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i>~David MacNeill</i></font></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Voltaic Converter Solar Backpack</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/archives/2007/12/voltaic_convert.html" />
<modified>2007-12-14T19:50:54Z</modified>
<issued>2007-12-11T21:20:27Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.personalmediareview.com,2007:/mt/6.102</id>
<created>2007-12-11T21:20:27Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Green is good, no question. It&apos;s even fashionable. So does wearing a backpack brandishing three large solar panels make you cool or a tool? That&apos;s a call you have to make for yourself. I like the look of Voltaic&apos;s Converter...</summary>
<author>
<name>dtm</name>

<email>davidmacneill@mac.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.personalmediareview.com/mt/">
<![CDATA[<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Green is good, no question. It's even fashionable. So does wearing a backpack brandishing three large solar panels make you cool or a tool? That's a call you have to make for yourself. I like the look of Voltaic's Converter in tan with green rimmed panels. It's less toolish than the same pack in Darth Vader black, blends better with outdoor environments, and is a bit cooler in the sun. If you are carrying a tuna sandwich in there, heat matters.</font></p>
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/voltaic-tan-green.jpg" align="right" hspace="4">
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">A few basic specs: The pack is made from recycled soda bottles, has a comfy breathable mesh padded back, wire-channels throughout for easy cabling, and has a fully padded compartment that can hold up to a 17-inch laptop. Unfortunately the solar panels cannot generate enough power to charge your laptop. You may be able to rig up a trickle charging setup but it isn't supported by Voltaic so proceed at your own risk.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The panels produce a respectable 4-watts so charging is noticeably faster than some other solar packs on the market. Fit and finish is excellent inside and out, with top-shelf zippers, fasteners, and fabrics. The inside is intelligently laid out with pockets right where they should be. You can carry a surprising amount of stuff for such a slim pack, but if it's not enough for you Voltaic offers several larger sizes in their line. You can also clip the Converter to the outside of another pack using the supplied connectors.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The Converter makes a fine pack for bicyclists and motorcyclists, with comfortable shoulder straps and clips for easy attachment to a rack or fuel tank. The straps can easily be arrayed to work as a messenger-style sling, if you prefer.</font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3">Charging through your day </font></strong><br />
    <font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Assuming you dig the Converter's aesthetic and you are able to part with $169-$199 bucks to own one, how does such a pack work in daily life? Depends on how often you go outside and what devices you carry around. All Voltaic packs include an ample array of eleven connectors to fit most devices. If all else fails, you can use the generic 5-volt USB adapter and charge using the cable that came with your device. And if you don't have USB charging as an option on your device, you can use the included 12-volt vehicle port to adapt any device that has a car charger adapter. There is no included iPod connector so you'll have to use the USB cable that came with your iPod. I'd recommend buying a spare to thread into the pack permanently.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">Let's say you, like me, carry an iPod, a mobile phone, a compact digital camera, and occasionally a compact iPod amp/speaker system. If you commute on public transport to an office, you can grab some rays en route. But unless your commute is hours long, your devices will likely make the trip just fine on a charge from home, so a solar backpack is not really needed. If you spend your day wandering around a campus, listening to lectures and music on your iPod and yakking/texting on your mobile all day, then the solar panels start to make sense. You can grab some rays many times throughout your day, storing the juice in the Converter's 2800 milliamp-hour lithium-ion battery pack. The pack allows you to connect two devices simultaneously: one from the battery and one directly to the panels. Even heavy iPod and mobile phone users will always be topped up and ready to rock.</font></p>
<img src="http://www.personalmediareview.com/images/voltaic-adapter-zoom.jpg" align="left" hspace="4">
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">The digital camera situation is a bit trickier since there are few direct-rechargeable cameras. You would need to pack along a dedicated camera battery charger than has a 12-volt vehicle adapter -- a fiddly and heavy proposition unless you shoot all day long or you are on an extended camping trip with no access to AC power.</font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="3">Rockin' 'round the campfire </font></strong><br />
  <font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">My iPod amp/speaker has a rechargeable battery which I was able to power from the Voltaic's battery. Under ideal weather conditions, you could go camping and have a portable music system for your campfire parties. Sure, you could do this with an iPod boombox that used disposable alkaline D cells, but burning through six or eight cells a day is expensive and about as un-green as you can get. And those batteries are heavy to pack in and heavier to pack out -- can't just toss 'em into the campfire with the eggshells and paper plates, mate!</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS">You won't find greener, better made, or more thoughtfully designed solar backpacks than the Voltaic line. If you are a heavy user of personal tech devices, your life takes you outside a lot, and you are down with the green-geek look of solar panels on your back, you can't do better than this. <a href="http://www.voltaicsystems.com">Voltaic Systems</a></font><br />
<font face="Trebuchet MS" size=2><i>~David MacNeill</i></font></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

</feed>